chore: Doc update for em default value and warning if dpf is not used. - #3656
Conversation
WalkthroughThe NICo DPF manual reformats its introductory expectations note and documents ChangesNICo DPF documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
🔍 Container Scan SummaryNo Grype artifacts were found to aggregate. |
|
🌿 Preview your docs: https://nvidia-preview-pull-request-3656.docs.buildwithfern.com/infra-controller |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/manuals/dpf.md`:
- Around line 34-38: Update the second note in the DPF documentation to scope
the “default provisioning strategy” claim to configurations where [dpf].enabled
is true, while preserving the existing warning behavior for hosts not using DPF.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 8cadccd9-60e3-4d6d-9c33-2c1af99fe9fc
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/manuals/dpf.md
polarweasel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a couple little changes to your couple little changes :)
Doc change for the commits:
Related issues
Type of Change
Breaking Changes
Testing
Additional Notes