This repository was archived by the owner on May 9, 2026. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Personas
SarOhayon edited this page Sep 25, 2025
·
50 revisions
| Persona | Key Details | Goals & Needs | Pain Points | Implications for Design |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commuter Carl | Profile: 25–50 years old. Works downtown or takes the train daily from Canora REM station. Drives a sedan or SUV, sometimes an electric car. Fairly comfortable with technology. Says: “If I can’t find a spot quickly, I’ll miss my train.” Goals/Needs: Wants secure daytime parking near transit, quick entry and exit with little waiting, and assurance that building tenants get priority for spots. Frustrations: Parking lots often show as “full” even when spaces are open, long time wasted circulating underground garages, and EV drivers often find charging stations taken. Design Implications: Display predicted availability during commuter hours, allow EV charger reservations with priority rules, and reduce entry steps with tools like RFID, QR access, or live updates. |
|||
| Resident Rachel | • Age: ~30–60 • Lives in the condo, parks daily or nightly • Drives a compact car, SUV, or EV • Tech level: Low–Medium • Quote: “I pay for my spot—there better be one waiting when I come home.” |
• Guaranteed spot when returning at night • Assurance commuters don’t take tenant spaces • Safe and clear navigation inside the garage |
• Fear of losing their space to temporary parkers • Confusion about rules or mis-parked cars • Noise or congestion from outsiders |
• Predictive algorithm must always protect tenant priority • Section-based signage to avoid mis-parking • Transparent reporting to reassure tenants |
| Garage Operator Oliver | • Age: ~35–55 • Property manager at Elora MTL • Oversees tenants, garage logistics, and commuter integration • Tech level: Medium • Quote: “I need real-time visibility and minimal complaints.” |
• Clear dashboard with occupancy, trends, and system health • Balance tenant satisfaction with commuter revenue • Automated monitoring, minimal manual work |
• Sensor or system failures causing complaints • Integration issues between RFID, cameras, and signage • Hard to justify system decisions without data |
• Intuitive dashboard with alerts and manual override • Robust fallback procedures (refresh, local storage) • Ability to show tenants live availability data |
| EV Ellie | • Age: ~28–45 • Early adopter of electric vehicles • Needs reliable charging during work hours • Tech level: High • Quote: “If I can’t charge here, I’ll park somewhere else.” |
• Guaranteed access to EV chargers • Non-EVs kept out of charging spots • Clear navigation to EV-compatible sections |
• EV chargers blocked by standard cars • Limited infrastructure • Spots appear “available” but unusable |
• AI must classify EV vs. non-EV and direct accordingly • Dashboard tracks EV occupancy separately • Alerts for blocked or malfunctioning chargers |