fix(connections): allow duplicate connection names - #90
Merged
Conversation
The form rejected a name matching any existing connection ('A connection
with this name already exists.'), which blocked saving even when the
duplicate was intentional (several connections to the same host, or just
not caring about unique labels). Drop the uniqueness check — only require
a non-empty name. Tests updated.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reported: 'A connection with this name already exists.' when the name isn't actually a duplicate — and more broadly, duplicate names should just be allowed.
The validator rejected any name matching an existing connection (case-insensitive). That blocks legitimate cases — several connections to the same host, or simply not caring about unique labels. Drop the uniqueness check; only a non-empty name is required.
Test updated (259 unit tests pass).