This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2023. It is now read-only.
Sort backup ls by timestamp#95
Merged
Merged
Conversation
AntiD2ta
approved these changes
Oct 9, 2023
Contributor
AntiD2ta
left a comment
AntiD2ta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Very nice addition, thank you. Approved!
AntiD2ta
force-pushed
the
feat/backup-ls-sort
branch
from
b4f1952 to
ec6a3aa
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes:
backup lswith more recent first.Types of changes
Testing
Requires testing Yes
In case you checked yes, did you write tests? No
Comments about testing , should you have some (optional)
Update current test case is sufficient.