-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
Add another tests for one file per channel intan rhs #1677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Zach McKenzie <92116279+zm711@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zach McKenzie <92116279+zm711@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zach McKenzie <92116279+zm711@users.noreply.github.com>
| data_from_neo = intan_reader.get_analogsignal_chunk(channel_ids=[channel_name], stream_index=amplifier_stream_index).squeeze() | ||
| np.testing.assert_allclose(data_raw, data_from_neo) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_correct_reading_one_file_per_channel_rhs_stim(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Duplication?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right one of the tests got duplicated. Weird I honestly thought it was a diff issue, but it must have been that the tests got reorganized so it didn't connected that they were the same? Not sure. But yeah we should clean that. I doesn't hurt anything, but it's untidy!
OK, @zm711.
I won't have time to fix the file name on gin this week but at least this way you can merge knowing that there is a test for file ordering in the one file per channel case:
#1676