chore(github): add discussion templates and route the issue chooser - #233
Conversation
Discussions was enabled with six categories and no content and no templates, so the chooser sent people to a tab that looked abandoned and an Ideas post had no prompt to answer. Adds templates for Ideas, Q&A and Show and tell, matching the tone of the existing issue templates: ask what is painful rather than what widget is wanted, and ask for the workaround, because that is what says how much a gap costs. Points the issue chooser at the specific categories rather than the Discussions root, and links the contribution map from it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 31 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
The template asked for full error output on a public form without the redaction reminder the bug report template already carries, which invites someone to paste a connection string or an API key into a public thread. Matches the wording in bug_report.yml and names the usual suspects. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Discussions has been enabled on this repository with six categories, zero posts and no templates. The issue chooser pointed at the Discussions root, so somebody arriving with a question landed on an empty tab with no prompt to answer.
What this changes
Three discussion templates, in
.github/DISCUSSION_TEMPLATE/:feature_request.yml, so nobody writes a long post about billing.The tone follows the existing issue templates rather than inventing a second voice.
The issue chooser now links three specific destinations instead of one generic one: the contribution map, Q&A, and Ideas. The old "Question or idea" link sent both audiences to the same place and neither found what they needed.
Why now
Part of the Community and repo health milestone, specifically #221.
Checks
bun run check-commentscovers YAML and passes. No source files touched, so lint, typecheck and tests are unaffected.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Greptile Summary
Adds structured GitHub Discussion templates and routes issue-chooser visitors to more specific community destinations.
Confidence Score: 5/5
The PR appears safe to merge.
No blocking failure remains; the previously reported disclosure concern is addressed by explicit guidance to redact sensitive output.
Important Files Changed
Reviews (3): Last reviewed commit: "Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/mai..." | Re-trigger Greptile