[17.0][FIX] mail_gateway_whatsapp: Use the existing template to process imported data - #1833
Merged
OCA-git-bot merged 1 commit intoMar 25, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
/ocabot merge patch |
Contributor
|
Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you. |
Contributor
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 74bd476. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Member
|
Can you please fw-port it to 18? |
Contributor
Author
I will |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When attempting to update templates from Meta, if a template with buttons already exists in the gateway configuration, the import process will fail because it cannot find the existing buttons and attempts to create them (again), causing the SQL constraint unique_name_for_template to fail.
The reason being that even if the imported template exists, the code calls the update method using an empty recordset instead of the actual existing template.
I've previously proposed another solution to this in #1831 , but as @pedrobaeza noted, it was easier than that.