Skip to content

[java] enhance JavaJAXRSSpecServerCodegenTest#3727

Merged
jmini merged 1 commit intoOpenAPITools:masterfrom
sullis:java-JavaJAXRSSpecServerCodegenTest-ftw
Aug 22, 2019
Merged

[java] enhance JavaJAXRSSpecServerCodegenTest#3727
jmini merged 1 commit intoOpenAPITools:masterfrom
sullis:java-JavaJAXRSSpecServerCodegenTest-ftw

Conversation

@sullis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sullis sullis commented Aug 22, 2019

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Ran the shell script under ./bin/ to update Petstore sample so that CIs can verify the change. (For instance, only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh, ./bin/openapi3/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the {LANG} (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc) code generator or {LANG} client's mustache templates). Windows batch files can be found in .\bin\windows\. If contributing template-only or documentation-only changes which will change sample output, be sure to build the project first.
  • Filed the PR against the correct branch: master, 4.1.x, 5.0.x. Default: master.
  • Copied the technical committee to review the pull request if your PR is targeting a particular programming language.

Description of the PR

(details of the change, additional tests that have been done, reference to the issue for tracking, etc)

@auto-labeler
Copy link
Copy Markdown

auto-labeler Bot commented Aug 22, 2019

👍 Thanks for opening this issue!
🏷 I have applied any labels matching special text in your issue.

The team will review the labels and make any necessary changes.

@jmini
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jmini commented Aug 22, 2019

Follow up of #3715

@jmini jmini merged commit f6ead7b into OpenAPITools:master Aug 22, 2019
@jmini jmini added this to the 4.1.1 milestone Aug 22, 2019
@sullis sullis deleted the java-JavaJAXRSSpecServerCodegenTest-ftw branch September 9, 2019 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants