test(conformance): bind Chat protected matrix fixes - #148
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
The new Chat revision, fixture paths, lock contents, and reviewed SHA-256 pins are consistent across tests, scripts, lock JSON, and documentation, with no remaining references to the prior revision.
Pull request overview
This PR updates the SDK’s cross-repository conformance “frozen inputs” to match the latest reviewed OpenCoven/chat producer revision, refreshing the associated fixture bytes and SHA-256 pinning so the validator continues to fail-closed against protected workflow drift.
Changes:
- Re-pins the compatible Chat evidence producer revision (commit/tree) and refreshes fixture references for the protected workflow, Windows bootstrap, and Unix supervisor preparation.
- Rotates the reviewed SHA-256 constants used to validate canonical workflow/bootstrap/supervisor bytes in both tests and the GitHub evidence script.
- Updates the frozen conformance lock and related release documentation to reflect the new producer revision.
File summaries
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tests/conformance-gaps.spec.ts | Updates fixture paths and expected frozen producer/workflow/bootstrap/supervisor digests to the new Chat revision. |
| tests/conformance-contract.spec.ts | Updates the contract test to require the new pinned Chat commit in workflow documentation. |
| scripts/github-conformance-evidence.mjs | Rotates reviewed SHA-256 constants used to verify protected workflow steps match canonical reviewed bytes. |
| conformance/client-v1-cross-repository-lock.json | Updates the frozen lock’s producer commit/tree and reviewed workflow/script digests. |
| docs/workflows/client-v1-cross-repository-conformance.md | Updates documented pinned producer commit references to the new revision. |
| RELEASING.md | Updates release documentation to reference the new pinned producer commit. |
Review details
- Files reviewed: 6/12 changed files
- Comments generated: 0
- Review effort level: Lite
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Validation
corepack pnpm@10.34.0 testcorepack pnpm@10.34.0 typecheckcorepack pnpm@10.34.0 verify:contractscorepack pnpm@10.34.0 verify:packagecorepack pnpm@10.34.0 lintAdvances #38.