docs: define participant decision-surface semantics - #774
Merged
Conversation
|
This was referenced Jul 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Summary
Define the joint participant-local semantics for tool affordances, decision surfaces, and exposure boundaries so downstream schema, runtime, and conformance work share one authoritative projection model.
Requirement UIDs
Related Issues
Closes #119
ADR Impact
Changes
Test Plan
make checkpasses (Spotless, SpotBugs, Error Prone, Checkstyle, JaCoCo)make policypasses (documentation/workflow guardrails)Passed
ACES_REQUIREMENT_UID=SEM-219 pre-commit run --all-files; the exact repository policy, requirement-governance, andtools/verify_all.pycommands; 3,773 unit tests (1 skipped, 46 deselected); 34 integration tests (2 skipped); 92% coverage; and a clean pre-push core/security review.Ground Control Checks
make policypassesgc_evaluate_quality_gatespasses or is unchanged by this repo-only changegc_run_sweepreviewed; findings fixed or recorded with rationaleTraceability
Checklist
docs/CODING_STANDARDS.md)@Auditedon new entities if applicable