Skip to content

docs: stop the org page contradicting the entire product - #1

Merged
abdulsaheel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/local-first-and-links
Jul 26, 2026
Merged

docs: stop the org page contradicting the entire product#1
abdulsaheel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/local-first-and-links

Conversation

@abdulsaheel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Part of a pass over the org's public surface. Sibling PRs: OpenStrap/protocol#17, OpenStrap/analytics#28, OpenStrap/edge#154, OpenStrap/backend.

The problem

This file is the first thing anyone sees at github.com/OpenStrap, and it said:

backend — the server. Ingests raw frames and computes everything. One Cloudflare Worker; self-host it or use mine.

That stopped being true when the architecture moved on-device in mid-2026. Meanwhile every other repo's README opens with "no cloud, no backend, nothing leaves your phone."

So a privacy-motivated visitor who hit the org page before the app page was told the project ships their biometrics to someone's Cloudflare worker. That's both wrong and the single worst thing to be wrong about, given local-first is the product's main differentiator.

Backend is now described as what it actually is — optional, not required, used only for legacy import, an update pointer, and two opt-in features that are off by default. (The backend repo's own README is fixed in its sibling PR.)

Also

  • How to get the app. iOS TestFlight and the Android APK now sit near the top, instead of one "Download the APK" buried in a bullet.
  • An explicit local-first paragraph — "that isn't a privacy setting you switch on, it's the architecture."
  • The medical-grade disclaimer, which was missing here.
  • Sharper analytics description: confidence tiers, and returning nothing rather than guessing.
  • BTC and EVM donation addresses.

This page is the first thing anyone sees at github.com/OpenStrap, and it
described backend as "the server. Ingests raw frames and computes
everything. One Cloudflare Worker; self-host it or use mine."

That has not been true since the architecture moved on-device in mid-2026.
Every other repo's README opens with "no cloud, no backend, nothing leaves
your phone" — so a privacy-motivated visitor who landed on the org page
first was told the project ships their biometrics to someone's worker,
which is both wrong and the single worst thing to be wrong about here.

Backend is now described as what it actually is: optional, not required,
and used only for legacy import, an update pointer, and two opt-in
features that are off by default.

Also adds what the page was missing: how to actually get the app. iOS
TestFlight and the Android APK now sit near the top instead of a single
"Download the APK" buried in a bullet. Adds the medical-grade disclaimer,
sharpens the analytics description to mention confidence tiers and
returning nothing rather than guessing, and adds BTC/EVM donation
addresses.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@abdulsaheel, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 38 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 35001144-9946-4ca3-b10a-8e616d76a3f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f6a00a0 and f58fd85.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • profile/README.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/local-first-and-links

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@abdulsaheel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@abdulsaheel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Action performed

Full review finished.


Your included review limit is currently reached under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. This review may still proceed through usage-based billing if eligible. Your next included review will be available in 38 minutes.

@abdulsaheel
abdulsaheel merged commit 1f528ad into main Jul 26, 2026
1 check passed
@abdulsaheel
abdulsaheel deleted the docs/local-first-and-links branch July 26, 2026 07:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant