Fix Braun--Jal Theorem 4.1 source matrix - #330
Conversation
|
Scheduled cleanup pass: removed three unreferenced wrappers that reindexed Claim (6) to Claim (7) and then used the stronger consecutive-G route. This leaves the corrected source |
|
Scheduled cleanup: removed the separately threaded |
|
Comparator repair: the only reported error was rewrite order in the word-level source step. The patch now proves the raw matrix-expression |
|
Scheduled mechanical cleanup: comparator for |
|
Scheduled cleanup only: replaced the comparator-reported |
Summary
[P,G;Q,H]matrixGproper positionChallenges.BraunJal.generalizedSnakeRookModel_theorem41for the concrete rook modelSource
B. Braun and A. Jal, Order polytopes of generalized snake posets are h-real-rooted*, arXiv:2607.00922v1:
Trust boundary
The concrete theorem leaves only combinatorial model facts explicit:
H_m = G_m - G_(m-1)Model coefficient nonnegativity is derived from
FiniteSkewBoard.rookPolynomial_hasNonnegCoeffs. No boundary hypothesis assumes real-rootedness, splitting, proper position, or interlacing.Acceptance audit
generalizedSnakeRookModel[P,G;Q,H]matrix and Claim (6)P (w.length + 1)def ...Statement : PropGsource requirementValidation
GitHub's full Lean library build and comparator workspace build are green at
ca79f490. The independent three-theorem kernel/axiom-closure comparator step is still running.Closes #320.