Update danielpalme/ReportGenerator-GitHub-Action action to v5.4.17

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
danielpalme/ReportGenerator-GitHub-Action	action	patch	v5.4.13 -> v5.4.17

---

Release Notes

danielpalme/ReportGenerator-GitHub-Action (danielpalme/ReportGenerator-GitHub-Action)

v5.4.17

Compare Source

v5.4.17

Compare Source

• danielpalme/ReportGenerator#756: Added new report type 'Markdown'
• danielpalme/ReportGenerator#757: Improved title elements in SVGs charts embedded in MHTML report

v5.4.16

Compare Source

v5.4.16

Compare Source

• danielpalme/ReportGenerator#755: Improved MHTML reports (inline CSS)

v5.4.15

Compare Source

v5.4.15

Compare Source

• danielpalme/ReportGenerator#752: Added support for Scoverage input format
• danielpalme/ReportGenerator#753: Added tiny history charts to HTML reports (if JavaScript is disabled)

v5.4.14

Compare Source

v5.4.14

Compare Source

• Added support for Testwell CTC++ coverage files (PRO version only)
• danielpalme/ReportGenerator#753: Added title elements to SVGs generated with SvgChart report type

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Update the danielpalme/ReportGenerator-GitHub-Action usage to v5.4.17 by updating the action reference to commit 9870ed167742d546b99962ff815fcc1098355ed8 in the workflow.

Why are these changes being made?

Bring in fixes and improvements from the latest action release. No changes to workflow logic beyond updating the action version.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

[korbit-ai]

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 727 tests  ±0   3 727 ✅ ±0   53s ⏱️ -1s
    3 suites ±0       0 💤 ±0 
    3 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit f1bd7ed. ± Comparison against base commit 66f5100.

This pull request removes 339 and adds 339 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ CreateUserJwt_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: CreateUserJwtRequest { Duration = 1800, SessionId = "68cd77d80009f1e1356a", UserId = "68cd77d80009fcc3c98d", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ CreateUserJwt_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: CreateUserJwtRequest { Duration = null, SessionId = null, UserId = "68cd77d800097e112dc3", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserLogs_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserLogsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "68cd77d8000a00450030", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserLogs_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserLogsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "68cd77d8000a0f4f0c3b", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserTargets_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserTargetsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "68cd77d8000a00101301", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserTargets_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserTargetsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "68cd77d8000a0d8fdeaa", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ UpdateUserLabels_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: UpdateUserLabelsRequest { Labels = ["label1", "label2"], UserId = "68cd77d8000a0e5c2b0f", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ UpdateUserLabels_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: UpdateUserLabelsRequest { Labels = ["label3", "label4"], UserId = "68cd77d8000a00b4e4ad", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared.Tests.Requests.Account.CreatePushTargetRequestTests ‑ IsValid_WithInvalidData_ReturnsFalse(request: CreatePushTargetRequest { Identifier = "", ProviderId = "provider123", TargetId = "68cd77d6003afb81aa6b", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared.Tests.Requests.Account.CreatePushTargetRequestTests ‑ IsValid_WithInvalidData_ReturnsFalse(request: CreatePushTargetRequest { Identifier = null, ProviderId = "provider123", TargetId = "68cd77d6003aff98cb8f", ValidationContext = None })
…

PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ CreateUserJwt_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: CreateUserJwtRequest { Duration = 1800, SessionId = "68e64b6c003d7ff5d479", UserId = "68e64b6c003d72e09555", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ CreateUserJwt_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: CreateUserJwtRequest { Duration = null, SessionId = null, UserId = "68e64b6c003d694256de", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserLogs_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserLogsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "68e64b6c003d75ef6107", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserLogs_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserLogsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "68e64b6c003d7fbf00da", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserTargets_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserTargetsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "68e64b6c003d75378874", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ ListUserTargets_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: ListUserTargetsRequest { Queries = null, UserId = "68e64b6c003d7934ed89", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ UpdateUserLabels_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: UpdateUserLabelsRequest { Labels = ["label1", "label2"], UserId = "68e64b6c003d8eeb191e", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server.Tests.Clients.Users.UsersClientTests ‑ UpdateUserLabels_ShouldReturnSuccess_WhenApiCallSucceeds(request: UpdateUserLabelsRequest { Labels = ["label3", "label4"], UserId = "68e64b6c003d8425472d", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared.Tests.Requests.Account.CreatePushTargetRequestTests ‑ IsValid_WithInvalidData_ReturnsFalse(request: CreatePushTargetRequest { Identifier = "", ProviderId = "provider123", TargetId = "68e64b6d00100df9f3d8", ValidationContext = None })
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared.Tests.Requests.Account.CreatePushTargetRequestTests ‑ IsValid_WithInvalidData_ReturnsFalse(request: CreatePushTargetRequest { Identifier = null, ProviderId = "provider123", TargetId = "68e64b6d00100e2dc760", ValidationContext = None })
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Package	Line Rate	Branch Rate	Complexity	Health
PinguApps.Appwrite.Client	98%	97%	153	✔
PinguApps.Appwrite.Server	98%	94%	161	✔
PinguApps.Appwrite.Shared	99%	99%	1439	✔
Summary	99% (3880 / 3934)	98% (753 / 767)	1753	✔