Feature/pna 2849 handle memory explosion bug#382
Merged
Conversation
ptajvar
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2026
Contributor
ptajvar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks great! Verified that the graph output remains the same.
Contributor
Author
|
I also prepped there release notes here now, since we want to do a release on this straight away now. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Updating polars seems to have caused the memory usage in the graph step to explode. This PR resolves this by swapping parts of the implementation from polars to duckdb.
Fixes: pna-2894
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Manually running the graph step and verifying that the memory usage seems to be back at roughly the 0.27.0 release levels.
PR checklist:
pyproject.tomland cited it properly