More 26.x mods#17
Conversation
|
going through the stfu feature list I think almost everything is already included by other mods? bar one or two, but it seems to step on the toes of a lot of other mods. the only feature I see that may be nice is the improved command suggestions which something similar could be added to chattweaks probably if desired |
should I remove it right now or make another pr when chattweaks updates? |
|
well I'm not saying that singular feature is a requirement to have. but I personally just don't like stfu as a mod since 95% of its feature list is useless and interferes with other mods. it feels like patcher all over again (originally made to quiet logs and transitioned to adding a bunch of random stuff). I also don't want to make any decisions for one client this is just my personal take (I don't have commit perms on this new repo anyways) |
|
did make an issue on chattweaks Polyfrost/ChatTweaks#13 |
|
shuttfup removed |
|
also starting to wonder if the skyblock list is going to be overwhelming. I'm not a skyblock player so can't comment on any of these mods directly, but I think one client should work on getting a default config going for skyblock mods. I say we let kath do it |
I am a skyblock player and I think current skyblock list is really limited. This pr contains mods I personally find useful and all of them contain many unique features that are not seen in oneclient right now. |
yeah I tried this and it didn't work out well. no one was happy and got more backlash than if I left it alone. and I also got no help from skyblock players about fixing it. I think polyfrost should probably run some sort of testing and focus group, I think it's due time with the amount of mods. after all the mods get added of course |
|
You sure about this one?
So true. |
alr I wasn't aware |
|
also what should I do about those merge conflicts (because they will be back every time github actions bot updates a mod) |
|
You can probably just run |
doesn't seem to help |
|
Oh yeah, it's still going to conflict because of the hashes. Just do the merge, and then review the diff with If it's only hashes, then do If there's other changes, |
|
assuming its the same as the original DataStorage and its just hash differences they will get automatically verified once the PR is merged, so you can just choose whatever hash you want, it'll get updated properly after |
|
are we sure consumable optimizer is safe for general use? until just a few months ago it was confirmed to flag on servers (see Walksy/ConsumableOptimizer#4). havent seen any reports for or against its safety since but im still wary about it also item physics lite cannot be disabled in game so it shouldnt be enabled by default (ive submitted a mod that adds a config menu with oneconfig to modrinth, would solve this issue) also not quite sure i agree with rescale being a replacement for view model. i dont mind removing view model if it causes issues but rescale doesnt seem to provide the same thing |
I've been using it for a long time on hypixel and mineman.club and haven't had any issues so far
I saw on discord, looks good 🔥
I didn't mean it's a direct replacement, it's just the only available option on modrinth for 26.1-26.2 that has no conflicts with animatium |
|
I'm also against adding consumable optimizer, it's far too cheat like to be opt out for servers imo. |
no config override needed. the original mod can't be disabled via config, and my mod forces it disabled by default |
4 participants
Mods:
Performance:
https://modrinth.com/mod/consumableoptimizerhttps://modrinth.com/mod/shuttfuphttps://modrinth.com/mod/walksylibQoL:
SkyBlock:
https://modrinth.com/mod/marketguardUtility:
Resourcepacks:
SkyBlock:
Closes #12