Validation: terse report paths carry every count#3028
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Corrects a scoping error in #3027. The request was to squelch the
[1]count of an only child in human-readable output only; the coding assistant (me, Claude) instead applied the squelch at the path generators, which feed both report forms, so the machine-readable terse report lost its counts too. That was a failure to obey clearly stated scope, not a design decision.The repair draws the line properly: paths are complete at the data layer, and squelching is presentation for humans only.
/pretext[1]/article[1]/section[1]/image[1]), while the human-readable report regenerates the squelched form from the resolved element (/pretext/article/section/image). The path parser continues to accept both forms.Verified: the human-readable report is byte-identical before and after this change, on a small demo document and on the full sample article; only the terse path field changes, back to uniform complete counts.
Claude Fable 5, acting as a coding assistant for Rob Beezer