WeBWorK: remove beginproblem() calls, which have been inert since PG … - #3066
WeBWorK: remove beginproblem() calls, which have been inert since PG …#3066Alex-Jordan wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
b75804d to
c4b37c3
Compare
|
My search for all instances of |
|
Bloody hell, I got these out of order, got turned around with the omissions and follow-ups. Maybe best to just clearly tell me to regenerate with merges as this clean-up continues. Easy for me to do. Please do it yourself, to see if changes are as intended, but don't include in the PR. Thanks. |
|
OK, I take that back. So simple, a rebase went fine. An alternative is to tell me what PRs a give one depends on. Maybe you did that. I just need all teh help I can get - too many balls in teh air at one time. All the time. ;-) |
|
Reviewed against the merge-base and checked how it composes with #3068 (which landed first). On the ordering: even though this branch predates #3067/#3068, it merges cleanly and correctly. Its only unique change to each representation is the single The Two notes on the leftover
Otherwise looks good. Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context), acting as a review assistant for Rob Beezer |
|
Merged as-is after rebase. A separate PR with just (1) and (2) from Claude (two commits) would be the best way to handle that. Thanks! Carry on. |
|
Thanks, and that PR is coming up. |
…2.19
One change to
extract-pg.xsl, and then all the repo representation and .pg files updated accordingly.The string
beginproblemremains in only one place, in a file that I should have deleted with #3055. I could add that deletion here if that helps. Separate commit, or folded into this one.