Add support for binary numbers (C-like)

[isc30]

0b0101001

[isc30]

ready

[Golmote]

Thanks again for contributing.
I'm a bit worried though when it comes to making changes to the c-like component, since it's used by many other components.
So I did a thorough check of each language using it, to see whether or not they support binary literals. The first thing that surprised me is that Standard C does not seem to support binary literals. AFAICT, although they are supported in GCC, they were only added in C++14. Therefore, I think they should be added to the cpp component instead of the c component.

Here follow the results of the current support state for binary literals in C-like languages in Prism.

Component	Support for binary literals	Redefinition of number	Justification for redefinition	Highlighting support in Prism
JavaScript	Yes	Yes	Binary literals, NaN, Infinity	Yes
JavaScript > ActionScript	Yes	No		Yes
JavaScript > CoffeeScript	Yes	No		Yes
JavaScript > Flow	Yes	No		Yes
JavaScript > N4JS	Yes	No		Yes
JavaScript > Pug	Yes	No		Yes
JavaScript > React JSX	Yes	No		Yes
JavaScript > TypeScript	Yes	No		Yes
C	No	Yes	/[ful]/ suffix	No
C > Bison	No	No		No
C > C++	Yes	No		No
C > C++ > Arduino	Yes	No		No
C > Objective-C	No	No		No
C > OpenCL	No	No		No
C#	Yes	Yes	Adds f suffix, drops e notation support (?). Should support optional underscores.	No
D	Yes	Yes	Binary literals, /[ulfi]/ suffix	Yes
Dart	No	No		No
F#	Yes	Yes	Binary literals, `/y	uy
GLSL	No	Yes	/[ulf]/ suffix	No
Go	No	Yes	i suffix	No
Groovy	Yes	Yes	Binary literals, underscores, /[glidf]/ suffix	Yes
Haxe	No	No		No
Java	Yes	Yes	Binary literals, floating-point hexadecimal, /[df]/ suffix	Yes
Java > Scala	No	Yes	Adds /[dfl]/ suffix, drops binary literals	No
Jolie	No	Yes	Restricts to decimal numbers	No
Kotlin	Yes	Yes	Binary literals, /[fFL]/ suffix	Yes
nginx	Yes ?	No		Yes
PHP	Yes	No		No
Processing	No	No		No
Protocol Buffers	No	No		No
Qore	Yes	Yes	Binary literals, floating-point hexadecimal, /[df]/ suffix	Yes
Reason	No	No		No
Ruby	Yes	No		No
Ruby > Crystal	Yes	Yes	Underscores, `/[uif](8	16
Ruby > Haml	Yes	No		No
Swift	Yes	Yes	Binary literals, underscores	Yes

So, as you can (hopefully) see from this table, there is a number of languages that do not have support for binary literals and do not override the definition of the numbers pattern inherited from the c-like component. This means adding support for binary literals in the c-like component would add unwanted support for them in those languages, and I don't think we want this to happen.

I'm closing this PR. If you want, feel free to create a new one to add support for binary literals in the cpp component instead (by redefining the numbers pattern entirely).