Expose sample gaps and edge_cases lists in CLI for operator inspection - #374
Merged
Conversation
ProtocolWarden
force-pushed
the
goal/c99f3159
branch
from
June 21, 2026 12:50
8ef3f14 to
b6c1aae
Compare
Owner
Author
CI has not gone green after 20 checks (1 failing: audit: failure). Not merged (red CI) and not closed (work preserved) — needs a human to fix CI. |
Owner
Author
|
Needs human attention (reason= CI has not gone green after 21 checks (1 failing: audit: failure). Not merged (red CI) and not closed (work preserved) — needs a human to fix CI. |
ProtocolWarden
force-pushed
the
goal/c99f3159
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 22, 2026 20:19
1fe1b13 to
b5186a1
Compare
…odian .console-R2) The board worker's task.md rewrite dropped the required '## Objective' section, tripping the .console budget/structure detector (surfaced under the colliding R2 id as a misleading 'README H1' finding). Restores the heading. Unblocks the audit + the OPEN_PR_GATE on the goal lane.
This was referenced Jun 22, 2026
1 task
ProtocolWarden
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2026
.console/task.md's active objective (expose gaps/edge_cases in the extraction-health CLI) was already implemented and merged as PR #374 — dataclass fields, get_extraction_health() collection loop, and the cli.py table-mode branch all exist, and 111/111 relevant tests pass. No code change needed this cycle; logging for operator visibility. Co-authored-by: ProtocolWarden <ProtocolWarden@users.noreply.github.com>
This was referenced Jul 13, 2026
ProtocolWarden
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2026
…e) (#463) task.md still targeted the extraction-health gaps/edge_cases CLI exposure objective, but it was already shipped in PR #374 (a675c1f) with 111/111 tests passing. Two prior watchdog cycles re-verified this same objective without updating task.md, risking repeated no-op re-verification. Mark the objective complete and note the outcome in log.md per the STEP 10 work-order-completion exception. Co-authored-by: ProtocolWarden <ProtocolWarden@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ProtocolWarden
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2026
The gaps/edge_cases extraction-health CLI objective shipped in PR #374 and was already verified complete in the 2026-07-07 and 2026-07-13 (12:41) watchdog cycles per log.md, but task.md itself was never updated — causing this cycle to re-run the same verification a third time. Mark it COMPLETE in task.md so future cycles skip straight to standard watchdog steps instead of re-deriving this from log.md. Co-authored-by: ProtocolWarden <ProtocolWarden@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Auto-generated by Operations Center execution.
Goal
Expose sample gaps and edge_cases lists in CLI for operator inspection
Definition of done (complete ALL before finishing)
file the task implies (implementation, tests, and docs as applicable). Do
not leave TODOs, stubs, or 'follow-up' gaps; a partial change is rejected
in review.
pass locally. If anything fails, fix it before finishing — do not hand
off a red build.
green. The PR you open should be mergeable as-is.