test_pwt.csv: the consumer notes are current again — all four repos repointed - #101
Merged
Conversation
…epointed The six translation consumer notes recorded a divergence (reads the source repo's raw URL, not this file) that closed today: zh-cn, fr and fa all merged their sync PRs and a basename sweep over the four live default branches certifies 1 read per pandas.md and 3 per polars.md with zero old-URL residue. The consumers header and the Track D migration comment now record the certified state, the remaining republish-lag deletion gate, and the two propagation traps hit on the way (sync opens PRs rather than committing; resync regenerates from the source PR's merge-time snapshot — QuantEcon/action-translation#276). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates dataset-tracking metadata to reflect that test_pwt.csv is now fully repointed across the source lecture repo and its three synced translation repos, removing now-stale “divergence” consumer notes and regenerating the catalog accordingly.
Changes:
- Update
migration.ymlTrack D commentary to record the completed repoints and clarify the remaining deletion gate (republish lag). - Remove translation-specific per-consumer
note:blocks fromlectures/test_pwt.csv.ymlnow that those consumers read fromdata-lectures. - Regenerate
CATALOG.mdso the “Used by” column no longer shows translation warning notes fortest_pwt.csv.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
migration.yml |
Updates Track D narrative for test_pwt.csv to reflect completed repoints and remaining deletion gate. |
lectures/test_pwt.csv.yml |
Removes stale translation consumer notes now that all four repos are repointed; updates the explanatory comment block. |
CATALOG.md |
Regenerated to reflect the manifest change (translation consumers no longer annotated with warning notes). |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes the six translation consumer notes on
test_pwt.csv.ymlwhose recorded divergence closed today — zh-cn, fr and fa all merged their Track D sync PRs, and a basename sweep over the four live default branches certifies one read per pandas.md and three per polars.md with zero old-URL residue (the fa regression from the stale-snapshot regeneration was restored same day in lecture-python-programming.fa#155; the defect itself is recorded in QuantEcon/action-translation#276).The consumers header and the Track D comment in migration.yml now record the certified state and the one gate that remains before the source-copy deletion: all four sites' published notebooks must republish from repointed source, since the read is a live fetch at cell execution.
Edit discipline: parsed comparison against main shows
consumersas the only differing top-level key (the note-stripping regex was anchored inside the consumers block after an unanchored first attempt matchedintegrity.upstream.noteat the same indent — the exact C1-flip trap, caught by the count assertion). Strict audit exits 0; CATALOG regenerated.🤖 Generated with Claude Code