chore(qsl): align canonical research metadata - #17
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bc09975f8f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| repo = "PoliticalEventTrackingResearch" | ||
| tier = "research" | ||
| ring = 2 | ||
| tier = "pipeline" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Keep QSL tier aligned with the research role
This repo is still documented and guarded as a research-only evidence repo (README.md says the QSL layer is research, and AGENTS.md calls it research-only), so changing only the machine-readable QSL metadata to tier = "pipeline" makes any inventory or governance tooling that reads qsl.toml classify it differently from the repository's stated role. If the repo has not actually been reclassified, this should remain research; otherwise the role docs and guardrails need to be updated in the same change.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
🤖 Codex PR ReviewPlease ensure a human reviewer checks this PR before merging. |
Part of the QuantStrategyLab P0-P5 hardening and convergence wave.
Highlights:
Local validation was run before push in the Codex execution session.