Skip to content

[Fix/scorecard-warnings] Fixed hashes - #37

Merged
RedExtreme12 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/scorecard-warnings
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

[Fix/scorecard-warnings] Fixed hashes#37
RedExtreme12 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/scorecard-warnings

Conversation

@RedExtreme12

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixed hashes

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@RedExtreme12, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 7 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 86e9cba3-e392-4ed0-a7ce-bba979be195e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0db4b6 and 6099073.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The security workflow updates the pinned ossf/scorecard-action revision from v2.4.3 to v2.4.4 without changing other workflow logic.

Changes

Security workflow

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update Scorecard action pin
.github/workflows/security.yml
The scorecard job references ossf/scorecard-action v2.4.4 instead of v2.4.3.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title matches the PR's main change: updating scorecard hashes to fix scorecard warnings.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the workflow hash update described in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/scorecard-warnings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@RedExtreme12 RedExtreme12 self-assigned this Jul 27, 2026
@RedExtreme12 RedExtreme12 added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 27, 2026
@RedExtreme12
RedExtreme12 merged commit 86eb80c into main Jul 27, 2026
44 checks passed
@RedExtreme12
RedExtreme12 deleted the fix/scorecard-warnings branch July 27, 2026 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant