[Feat] Revise RV32I46F_5SP_MMIO's module instanciation order for better vivado source browsing#213
Merged
ChoiCube84 merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom Dec 13, 2025
Merged
Conversation
…er vivado source browsing
ChoiCube84
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2025
Collaborator
ChoiCube84
left a comment
ChoiCube84
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good. Ordering is important indeed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Revised CPU Top module's module instanciation ordering.
This is for better browsing experience in Vivado, since their source file ordering is followed by the TOP module's instanciation ordering.
Much better.
This is tested with Vivado via Dhrystone