fix(pull-requests): carry reviewed Gitea fixes into the fork

[kalvenschraut]

The reviewed dependency/Gitea follow-up #36 conflicts with two test assertions already present on rtvision. This merge resolution preserves both histories, retains the destination tracking assertion, adds the dependency-only flag assertion, and keeps the exact timeline next-link assertion. It carries the shared inline-comment budget and honest headerless-page coverage into the fork's existing integration tree.

Only the Gitea API, its focused tests, and the corrected Gitea user guidance differ from rtvision. Existing SSH/WSL work stays in the destination history. The original feature PR branches remain unchanged.

Validation: 75 focused API/provider-activity tests passed; server typecheck passed; diff checks passed. The existing navigator passed integrated browser checks on #29; before/after and state screenshots are uploaded in PR #29’s evidence comment. No GitHub PR has been merged by this change.

Implementation: Codex (GPT-6), with the destination merge resolution prepared and verified by GPT-5.6 Terra medium in Codex. Existing UI design: Claude Fable 5.1 through Claude CLI; no UI code changes here.

[kalvenschraut]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 99307b5f-eea6-4056-ab18-cd312d3eb1f1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3ad932 and ee12f36.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• apps/server/src/pullRequest/GiteaPullRequestApi.test.ts
• apps/server/src/pullRequest/GiteaPullRequestApi.ts
• docs/user/source-control.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Gitea pull request pagination now detects uncertain results and shares a bounded inline-comment budget across reviews. Relationship-only reads omit tracking parameters. Tests cover these behaviors and exact timeline pagination URLs. Gitea capability documentation now includes additional supported actions.

Changes

Gitea pull request updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Pagination and relationship reads apps/server/src/pullRequest/GiteaPullRequestApi.ts, apps/server/src/pullRequest/GiteaPullRequestApi.test.ts	Pagination marks page-sized, headerless results as potentially truncated. Relationship-only reads omit include_tracking. Tests verify request parameters and exact timeline URLs.
Shared review comment budget apps/server/src/pullRequest/GiteaPullRequestApi.ts, apps/server/src/pullRequest/GiteaPullRequestApi.test.ts	Review comment retrieval shares one row budget across reviews, stops when the budget is exhausted, and reports truncation. Tests cover missing pagination evidence and malformed rows.
Gitea capability documentation docs/user/source-control.md	Documentation lists comment editing, reactions, workflow approval, and revert pull requests. Workflow approval and revert support depend on server-advertised features.

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to ee12f

Gitea pull-request reads now report uncertain pagination, bound inline-comment retrieval across reviews, and document supported capabilities. No current merge-readiness risk is identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 2…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main change: carrying reviewed Gitea fixes into the fork.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains what changed, why it changed, scope, and validation results. It does not use the template headings or include the checklist, but the required information is mostly present and…

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch stacks/rtvision-integration

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}