Skip to content

fix: pentest_framework_tasks already in safe_signals, mark task #0210 done#203

Merged
fazxes merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/0210-pentest-signal-safe-signals
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix: pentest_framework_tasks already in safe_signals, mark task #0210 done#203
fazxes merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/0210-pentest-signal-safe-signals

Conversation

@fazxes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@fazxes fazxes commented Apr 9, 2026

Summary

  • Verified that pentest_framework_tasks is already present in the safe_signals dict in .recursive/engine/pick-role.py (line 346), positioned between friction_entries and pending_tasks as required
  • The signal was added in a prior session; the task acceptance criteria are fully met
  • Marked task 0210.md as status: done with completed: 2026-04-08

Test plan

  • Inspected pick-role.py lines 334-355 to confirm pentest_framework_tasks is present in safe_signals
  • make check passes (all 919 tests, ruff, mypy, ASCII check, install.sh refs)

…ignals

The signal was already present in pick-role.py safe_signals dict (line 346)
between friction_entries and pending_tasks as required by the acceptance
criteria. Mark task #210 as done.
@fazxes fazxes merged commit 4095a81 into main Apr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@fazxes fazxes deleted the fix/0210-pentest-signal-safe-signals branch April 9, 2026 00:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant