Skip to content

fix: pentest_framework_tasks already in safe_signals, mark task #0210 done #203

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
fazxes merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix: pentest_framework_tasks already in safe_signals, mark task #0210 done #203

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions .recursive/tasks/0210.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
---
status: pending
status: done
priority: low
target: recursive
vision_section: none
created: 2026-04-08
source: code-review-advisory
completed:
completed: 2026-04-08
---

# Add pentest_framework_tasks to --with-signals safe_signals in pick-role.py
Expand All @@ -22,6 +22,6 @@ for consistency and transparency, it should also appear in the safe_signals bloc

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] `"pentest_framework_tasks": signals["pentest_framework_tasks"]` added to safe_signals dict
- [ ] Position: between `friction_entries` and `pending_tasks` for logical grouping
- [ ] `make check` passes
- [x] `"pentest_framework_tasks": signals["pentest_framework_tasks"]` added to safe_signals dict
- [x] Position: between `friction_entries` and `pending_tasks` for logical grouping
- [x] `make check` passes
Loading