Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Researchers are not aware of the resources to cite software #14

Open
rayi113 opened this issue Jan 21, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@rayi113
Copy link

commented Jan 21, 2015

Use Case: Researchers are not aware of the resources to cite software

  • Contributors: Leslie Hsu

Goals and Summary

A graduate student wrote a script to analyze data for a publication. They want to cite the software in the publication, but don't know where to submit the software, how to document it, or how to get a citable identifier, and how to cite the script.

Why is it important and to whom?

This is important for authors (they don't know what to do), and the publishers (if they want to promote this.)

Why hasn’t it been solved yet?

A solution may very well exist, but the problem is INFORMING the wider community of what is the best practice. (I don't know what is the best solution though.)

Actionable Outcomes

Additional Information and Links

@mbjones

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jan 23, 2015

  • For describing the software, see theMozilla Science Lab codemeta project that is crosswalking software description vocabularies. But you are right, best practice has not been established, nor has minimum practice.
  • In terms of repos that will accept software uploads and generate DOIs, there are several choices:
    • General purpose archives like the KNB and FigShare and Zenodo
    • Code repositories like GitHub
    • Languages-specific repos (like CRAN, PyPi, etc.), but these tend to only accept libraries intended for re-use, and don't generally mint DOIs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.