Yes, sort of. But scientists use it too, and here's why it's actually useful for what you're about to see.
Essentially, instead of publishing a blog where each post is finalized and polished, Github allows writers to submit commits, like an edit history. This allows you, as a reader, to read what's currently available and trust that as I continue to learn, I will continue to update what exists in my publication. So, less emphasis goes on getting an article right the first time, and more time is delegated to writing, researching, and updating as we go.
It also allows you to come back in the future, and see what's changed through the commit history. Or, trust that you can link an article to a peer and it will remain current. Anyway, that's enough of that. So, the question is:
- My name is Rex, and I write technical articles using Philosophy of Science and my education in Medical Sciences to write articles centered around science and scientific discourse for Scientists, Philosophers of Science, and Scientific Thinkers.
- RXMD is a science publication here on Github that focuses on scientific discourse: how science is argued for, defended, and misrepresented in science denialism using 21st Century Philosophy of Science language, and my personal expertise being a Scientific Thinker.
If you're ready to read articles, click the link and it will redirect you to the RXMD repository. There, you can read the README.MD for help, or select the Articles File, which I'll conveniently link here: https://github.com/Rex-Soderlund-RXMD/RXMD/tree/main/Articles
Conversely, you can see my RXMD repository just below this README.md