fix: UiKit Playground using wrong surface#37418
Conversation
|
Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉 |
|
WalkthroughThe Surface component's Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5–10 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/uikit-playground/src/Components/Preview/Display/Surface/Surface.tsx (1)
94-94: Consider using nullish coalescing operator (??) instead of logical OR (||).The
||operator treats all falsy values (null, undefined, false, 0, '', NaN) as triggers for the fallback. Ifsurfacecould legitimately be a falsy but valid value,??would be more precise as it only checks for null/undefined.Apply this diff if you want stricter nullish handling:
- surface={screens[activeScreen]?.payload.surface || SurfaceOptions.Message} + surface={screens[activeScreen]?.payload.surface ?? SurfaceOptions.Message}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/uikit-playground/src/Components/Preview/Display/Surface/Surface.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/uikit-playground/src/Components/Preview/Display/Surface/Surface.tsx (1)
92-94: Both components receive identical values due to SurfaceRender's default parameter.The review comment identifies a false inconsistency.
SurfaceRenderhas a default parametertype = SurfaceOptions.Messagein its component definition, so whenundefinedis passed, it defaults toSurfaceOptions.Message—the same value thatDraggableListexplicitly receives via the||operator. Both components handle the undefined case identically by design.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #37418 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 68.12% 63.86% -4.27%
===========================================
Files 3364 3081 -283
Lines 115749 112369 -3380
Branches 20909 20314 -595
===========================================
- Hits 78855 71764 -7091
- Misses 34204 38411 +4207
+ Partials 2690 2194 -496
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)
Some elements were not working right despite having the correct payload, caused by the wrong surface being passed down in the component tree.
Issue(s)
Steps to test or reproduce
Further comments
Summary by CodeRabbit