Regarding the License

[dheerajmpai]

I just observed that the license for the code is changed from MIT to non-commercial/research use only. I would be really glad if I can know the reason for the same. is it because of the dataset used. Or whether the researchers want to commercialize the work themselves or some other reason. I had been training the code on a separate dataset for quite sometime considering the restrictions by LRS2. And understanding the restrictions of the License would be very helpful for me to proceed further

[Rudrabha]

At the moment, we thought it will be best to remove because our model is trained on LRS2 and should not be used for commercial purposes.

[joodykimdev]

Thanks for your great works, Rudrabha!
You mean that these non-commercial use license can be resolved by training except any non-commercial dataset?

You added the SW license statement in readme.md. but at first, there is no such license statement.

---

License and Citation
The software can only be used for personal/research/non-commercial purposes.

Are there any license problems in these codes, not just the problem related to the LRS2 dataset's one?
how can I resolve these non-commercial issues?

[zgxiangyang]

I am facing the same problem. Hope the code to be commercially available and avoid rewriting. We will train on other datasets.