Adding caloskim RawDigitproducers labels - #658
Conversation
|
trigger build LArSoft/lar*@LARSOFT_SUITE_v10_04_03 SBNSoftware/sbndaq-artdaq-core@v1_10_04 SBNSoftware/sbncode@v10_04_03 |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase ci_tests SBND on slf7 for e26:prof - ignored warnings for build -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the ci_tests SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
trigger build LArSoft/lar*@LARSOFT_SUITE_v10_04_01 SBNSoftware/sbndaq-artdaq-core@v1_10_04 SBNSoftware/sbncode@v10_04_01 |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard |
|
❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard 🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
🚨 For more details about the warning phase, check the ci_tests SBND phase logs parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard |
|
Approved, expected changes from cvn still being in references |
Description
This is for the workflow with raw digits.
In the test production raw digits are saved in reco1 and reco2 files, but not in calib ntuple. It turned out the reco2 fcl miss the RawDigitproducers labels for caloskim. This fcl patches that. This fcl is needed for the 2025 Feb workshop production.
Checklist
Reviewers,AssigneesDevelopementRelevant PR links (optional)
Does this PR require merging another PR in a different repository (such as sbnanobj/sbnobj etc.)?
Link(s) to docdb describing changes (optional)
Is there a docdb describing the issue this solves or the feature added?