Skip to content
View SafeerAhmad211's full-sized avatar
🎯
Focusing
🎯
Focusing

Block or report SafeerAhmad211

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
SafeerAhmad211/README.md

Safeer Ahmad, M.S., SHRM-CP, MLSecOps

Founder & Principal, Nauta Research Labs — Independent HR Analytics & AI Assurance

Building governance infrastructure for AI systems that make employment decisions — at the intersection of I-O psychology, employment law, and ML security.

Website Google Scholar DOI SHRM-CP


About

Automated screening is effectively universal in large-employer hiring: 99% of Fortune 500 companies use an applicant tracking system, and 88% of employers acknowledge that their system screens out qualified candidates.1 Independent verification has not kept pace. When Cornell researchers measured compliance with NYC Local Law 144 — the first law anywhere requiring bias audits of automated employment decision tools — they found that of 391 employers surveyed, 18 had posted an audit report and 11 posted both an audit report and a conforming transparency notice.2

I build the methodology and tooling to close that gap.

I am the author of the AVS Framework (Audit • Validation • Security), a unified governance methodology for AI employment decision systems:

  • Audit — adverse impact analysis under the Uniform Guidelines (29 C.F.R. 1607) and state bias-audit laws (NYC Local Law 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado SB 26-189)
  • Validation — I-O psychology validity evidence (SIOP Principles, job analysis, KSAO mapping, differential item functioning) proving AI tools measure what they claim to
  • Security — ML threat assessment aligned to NIST AI RMF 1.0 / AI 600-1 and the OWASP ML Top 10 (data poisoning, model extraction, prompt injection, drift)
  • Governance — policy, human-oversight, and monitoring maturity assessment for sustained compliance

Most AI hiring audits check one of these four boxes. AVS checks all four in a single, repeatable, standards-mapped assessment.

How it is licensed. The Audit and Security pillars are released as MIT-licensed open-source software (below) — free to run, modify, redistribute, and deploy commercially, with no registration, key, quota, or restriction. The Validation and Governance pillars require job analysis and organizational assessment performed with a client, and are delivered as professional services through Nauta Research Labs, the research and consulting venture I founded.

Featured Project

avs-framework — open-source (MIT licensed) statistical engine implementing the Audit and Security pillars.

PyPI CI Downloads DOI

pip install avs-framework

Every release is archived to Zenodo with a citable DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21806797

Adverse impact Four-fifths rule per 29 C.F.R. 1607.4D, pooled two-proportion Z-test, and automatic fallback to Fisher's exact test when expected cell counts fall below 5
Severity model Four-level classification that separates practical from statistical significance, surfacing the disparities that single-criterion audits miss
Name-swap bias testing Black-box test for name-based bias in resume scoring, using fully synthetic resumes
Drift detection Chi-square composition drift, Kolmogorov-Smirnov score drift, and per-group selection-rate drift between periods

Runs on de-identified applicant flow exports from any ATS (Workday, Greenhouse, iCIMS, Lever) — no vendor source code or model access required. Tested against Python 3.10–3.13, with an 80% line-coverage floor enforced in CI.

Background

Education

  • M.S., Industrial-Organizational Psychology — Missouri State University
  • Graduate Certificate, Statistics and Research Design — Missouri State University

Certifications

  • SHRM-CP — Society for Human Resource Management
  • MLSecOps — Protect AI
  • Prosci ADKAR — change management

Peer-reviewed publications

  • The Role of AI in Reducing Implicit Bias in Recruitment — IJARCST, 2024
  • Evaluating an AI-Driven CAT Platform — IJIRCCE, 2025
  • Green AI for Sustainable Employee Attrition Prediction — IJARCST, 2025

Citation record: Google Scholar

Technical reports — self-published, not peer-reviewed

  • Dual-Endeavor Assurance for AI Employment Decision Tools — Nauta Research Labs, 2026

Peer review service

  • Reviewer, International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations — large language model safety, red-teaming methodology, AI governance

Toolbox

Statistics & Psychometrics — adverse impact modeling, DIF / measurement invariance, CFA, SEM, validity coefficient correction, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Engineering — Python (pandas, numpy, scipy), R, SPSS, Power BI; data pipelines for HRIS/ATS exports

Standards — Title VII, ADEA, ADA, Uniform Guidelines (29 C.F.R. 1607), NIST AI RMF, OWASP ML Top 10, SIOP Principles, AERA/APA/NCME Testing Standards


Independent AI assurance for employment decision systems — Nauta Research Labs

Footnotes

  1. Fuller, J. B., Raman, M., et al. (2021). Hidden Workers: Untapped Talent. Harvard Business School Project on Managing the Future of Work and Accenture.

  2. Wright, L., et al. (2024). Null Compliance: NYC Local Law 144 and the Challenges of Algorithm Accountability. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.

Popular repositories Loading

  1. SafeerAhmad211 SafeerAhmad211 Public

    Profile README

    1

  2. avs-framework avs-framework Public

    Open-source statistical engine for auditing AI employment decision systems: adverse impact analysis under the Uniform Guidelines (29 CFR 1607), name-swap bias testing, and model drift detection

    Python 1