Selenium does not use log4j

[mdmintz]

Selenium does not use log4j

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to quickly review and merge it

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

Description

Selenium does not use log4j

Motivation and Context

Selenium does not use log4j

Types of changes

• Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
• Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
• Improved translation
• Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

[netlify]

✔️ Deploy Preview for jovial-austin-42fe02 ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 0c0148a

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/jovial-austin-42fe02/deploys/61c22fc8088a730007ab2333

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-897--jovial-austin-42fe02.netlify.app/

[ddavison]

I'm not sure it's worth noting what Selenium does not use. I anticipate if we start with this, we'll have a list of all of the software that we do not use that has a major exploit found.

Could you maybe provide more motivation and context? 🙏

[mdmintz]

@ddavison This is the context:

[ddavison]

@ddavison This is the context:

I think we should be able to use the dismissible banner for this instance 🤔

I think this would be better than a blurb on the header. What do you think?

[mdmintz]

@ddavison Based on the code when the banner was last used (ebcafc8) the folder structure has changed significantly (there's no more site_source_files directory) and so I would only be guessing the new structure that you'd want for that, and that would likely involve a lot of back-and-forth PR questions and comments like this. I picked a reasonable alternative (the bold text is still noticeable) and since I imagine that this special message will only be up for about a month (at which point all major Selenium users concerned about Log4j would already understand that Selenium does not use it) then the styling of the message isn't too significant. After-all, this is a temporary message to begin with.

[ddavison]

@ddavison Based on the code when the banner was last used (ebcafc8) the folder structure has changed significantly (there's no more site_source_files directory) and so I would only be guessing the new structure that you'd want for that, and that would likely involve a lot of back-and-forth PR questions and comments like this. I picked a reasonable alternative (the bold text is still noticeable) and since I imagine that this special message will only be up for about a month (at which point all major Selenium users concerned about Log4j would already understand that Selenium does not use it) then the styling of the message isn't too significant. After-all, this is a temporary message to begin with.

Yeah, looks like we should create a dismissible-banner shortcode. I have a local WIP I can upload.

[mdmintz]

@ddavison That works. Looks like you already have the code for the dismissible banner.

[ddavison]

@ddavison That works. Looks like you already have the code for the dismissible banner.

Yeah, the code was already there, just had to adapt it quickly to Hugo 🙃 . You're simple solution worked perfectly! This is just a more long-term solution that enables other things like this in the future 🙏

Would you review #898 ?

[mdmintz]

@ddavison #898 Looks good. I'm not an authorized reviewer, but I approve your changes.

[mdmintz]

Closing this in favor of #898