[AMD/ROCm] kimik2.5-fp4-mi355x-atom. Bump ATOM image to rocm/atom:rocm7.2.3_ubuntu24.04_py3.12_pytorch_release_2.10.0_atom20260511 - #1387
Conversation
Bump the ATOM image from rocm/atom:rocm7.2.1-ubuntu24.04-pytorch2.9.1-atom0.1.2 to rocm/atom-dev:nightly_202605111702, matching the latest upstream ATOM benchmark run (https://github.com/ROCm/ATOM/actions/runs/25686894636). Performance improvement vs previous InferenceX data (tp=4): isl=1024/osl=1024: +12% to +31% at c=4-16, neutral at c=32-128 isl=8192/osl=1024: +17% to +25% at c=4-16, +17% at c=128
|
Thanks for the contribution! For vLLM & SGLang, please ensure that your recipes is similar to the official vLLM recipes and/or the SGLang cookbook If it is not, please create a PR first before we can merge your single node PR into the master branch. Let's ensure that the documentation is first class such that the entire ML community can benefit from your hard work! Thank you PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. If re-running failed jobs is attempted, PR authors are responsible for ensuring it passes. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/manage-workflow-runs/re-run-workflows-and-jobs#re-running-failed-jobs-in-a-workflow As a rule of thumb, generally, PR authors should request a review & get a PR approval from the respective companies' CODEOWNERS before requesting a review from core maintainers. If additional help is needed, PR authors can reach out to core maintainers over Slack. |
1 similar comment
|
Thanks for the contribution! For vLLM & SGLang, please ensure that your recipes is similar to the official vLLM recipes and/or the SGLang cookbook If it is not, please create a PR first before we can merge your single node PR into the master branch. Let's ensure that the documentation is first class such that the entire ML community can benefit from your hard work! Thank you PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. If re-running failed jobs is attempted, PR authors are responsible for ensuring it passes. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/manage-workflow-runs/re-run-workflows-and-jobs#re-running-failed-jobs-in-a-workflow As a rule of thumb, generally, PR authors should request a review & get a PR approval from the respective companies' CODEOWNERS before requesting a review from core maintainers. If additional help is needed, PR authors can reach out to core maintainers over Slack. |
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@functionstackx @cquil11 https://inferencex.semianalysis.com/inference?unofficialRun=25962958917 |
Summary
Bumps the ATOM docker image for
kimik2.5-fp4-mi355x-atomfrom:to:
Performance vs previous InferenceX data
Based on comparing InferenceX benchmark (date: 2026-04-01) against ATOM upstream run #25686894636 (2026-05-11,
rocm/atom-dev:nightly_202605111702):No changes to the benchmark script or serve arguments — image bump only.