-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Day 5: Student project
For your final project, you will independently analyze an RNA-seq dataset generated during the VTK 2024 practical course. The objective is to apply the complete RNA-seq workflow that you learned throughout this practical course to investigate the transcriptional response of HeLa Kyoto wild-type (WT) cells following UV-induced DNA damage.
Unlike the guided exercises based on Boström et al. (2017), this project is designed to give you the opportunity to perform the analysis independently. You are encouraged to consult software documentation, online resources, and the course materials whenever necessary.
The aim is not simply to obtain a list of differentially expressed genes, but to demonstrate that you understand each stage of an RNA-seq analysis workflow—from raw sequencing reads to biological interpretation.
How does UV-induced DNA damage alter gene expression in HeLa cells over time, and which biological pathways are associated with the cellular response and apoptosis?
At the beginning of each VTK practical week:
- 5 × 10⁶ HeLa Kyoto WT cells were seeded in a Petri dish containing 5 mL growth medium.
- Cells were cultured for 24 hours.
- Cells were exposed to 20 mJ UV irradiation to induce DNA damage.
- Samples were harvested at:
- 0 hours (Control)
- 1 hour
- 3 hours
- Each condition contains three biological replicates, resulting in 9 RNA samples.
After harvesting:
- Cells were lysed directly on the dish using 300 μL Milli-Q water.
- The lysate was transferred into a microcentrifuge tube.
- The plate was rinsed with an additional 100 μL Milli-Q water, which was added to the same tube.
- Samples were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
- Samples were stored at −80°C until RNA extraction and sequencing.
| Condition | Time | Biological Replicates |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 h | 3 |
| UV-treated | 1 h | 3 |
| UV-treated | 3 h | 3 |
Total samples: 9
| Sample | Cell Type | Time | Replicate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0h_Rep1 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 0 h | 1 |
| 0h_Rep2 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 0 h | 2 |
| 0h_Rep3 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 0 h | 3 |
| 1h_Rep1 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 1 h | 1 |
| 1h_Rep2 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 1 h | 2 |
| 1h_Rep3 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 1 h | 3 |
| 3h_Rep1 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 3 h | 1 |
| 3h_Rep2 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 3 h | 2 |
| 3h_Rep3 | HeLa Kyoto WT | 3 h | 3 |
The sequencing data are paired-end Illumina FASTQ files.
Example:
ls VTK2024-RNAseq/*.fastq.gzT0_MAZP0_1.fastq.gz
T0_MAZP0_2.fastq.gz
T0_PF0h_1.fastq.gz
T0_PF0h_2.fastq.gz
T0_SH0_1.fastq.gz
T0_SH0_2.fastq.gz
T1_Lh1_1.fastq.gz
T1_Lh1_2.fastq.gz
T1_MK1h_1.fastq.gz
T1_MK1h_2.fastq.gz
T1_MW1h_1.fastq.gz
T1_MW1h_2.fastq.gz
T3_IA03_1.fastq.gz
T3_IA03_2.fastq.gz
T3_JL3h_1.fastq.gz
T3_JL3h_2.fastq.gz
T3_SP3_1.fastq.gz
T3_SP3_2.fastq.gz
Each sample consists of two FASTQ files:
- Read 1 (R1)
- Read 2 (R2)
You are expected to perform the same RNA-seq workflow that we completed for Boström et al. (2017).
- Create a suitable project directory structure.
- Inspect the raw FASTQ files.
- Perform quality assessment using FastQC.
- Examine sequencing quality.
- Remove adapters and low-quality bases using fastp.
- Reassess read quality after trimming.
- Download or use the provided reference transcriptome.
- Build (or use) the provided Kallisto index.
- Understand why indexing is required.
Use Kallisto to quantify transcript abundance for each sample.
After quantification:
- Inspect the output files.
- Understand TPM, estimated counts, and abundance estimates.
- Organize all outputs into a single directory.
Using R, perform the downstream analysis:
- Import Kallisto outputs using tximport.
- Generate gene-level counts.
- Create the DESeq2 dataset.
- Normalize the data.
- Perform differential expression analysis.
Generate the following visualizations where appropriate:
- PCA plot
- Sample distance heatmap
- MA plot
- Volcano plot
- Heatmap of differentially expressed genes
Perform functional analysis of the differentially expressed genes.
Include:
- Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment
- KEGG pathway enrichment
- Appropriate visualizations
- Biological interpretation
Interpret your results.
Consider questions such as:
- Which genes respond to UV treatment?
- Which genes are up- or down-regulated?
- Which pathways are enriched?
- Are apoptosis-related pathways activated?
- How do the responses differ between 1 hour and 3 hours?
- Are your findings consistent with current biological knowledge?
Throughout the practical sessions, every analysis step was performed manually to help you understand the underlying methods and software.
Since you are now familiar with Nextflow and workflow management systems, you are encouraged to complete this project using an appropriate Nextflow RNA-seq pipeline (e.g. an nf-core RNA-seq workflow) if you wish.
Using a workflow management system is considered best practice because it improves:
- Reproducibility
- Scalability
- Automation
- Portability
Regardless of the approach you choose, you should understand every step of the analysis and be able to explain and interpret your results.
Submit:
- Project directory
- Analysis scripts (R or R Markdown)
- Figures
- Differential expression results
- Functional enrichment results
Prepare a short report (approximately 2–4 pages) including:
- Introduction
- Experimental Design
- Methods
- Results
- Functional Enrichment Analysis
- Discussion
- Conclusions
Your project will be assessed on:
- Correct application of the RNA-seq workflow
- Organization and reproducibility
- Quality of analyses and figures
- Appropriate statistical analysis
- Biological interpretation
- Quality of the final report
The emphasis is on demonstrating your understanding of the complete RNA-seq analysis workflow rather than simply reproducing expected results.