Advice needed for adopting multi-agent workflow to Citadel #153
-
|
Hello! Until now, before using Citadel, I've been using a three-pronged LLM collab setup at my day job. This human <-> LM <-> LLM process is slow but it delivers highly robust work, such as a recent bundle of PowerShell and Google App Script migration scripts that worked almost perfectly in my initial testing. Each phase of my process in a nutshell:
Now that I'll be using Citadel, what's the best way to go forward with this sort of setup? Is it as simple as using Claude to modify the necessary Citadel files so that any LLM working with that repo's aware of this sort of collaboration, at least at a high level? Thank you! 🙏 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hey Zg! You’re already thinking about this in the right shape. Citadel is built for exactly this kind of human-led, multi-agent workflow. The main difference is that it gives the handoff, memory, routing, and verification a repo-native structure instead of leaving you to maintain a custom You can bring your existing ChatGPT planning phase into Citadel, or you can run the whole loop inside Citadel. If you want the Citadel-only version, I’d map your current phases like this:
Practically, I’d start project-local:
I would not start by asking Claude/Codex to modify Citadel core files. Start by configuring the target repo. Only change Citadel itself if you discover a general workflow Citadel should support for every user, not just one repo. The big shift is that agents should stop writing loose summaries into a custom exchange folder and start leaving structured repo evidence:
So the short answer is: yes, you can keep your workflow shape and do it entirely inside Citadel. Use Citadel’s planning, campaign, and fleet structure as the shared memory layer, then let You can do your workflow with Citadel as the execution layer (and architecture) while still using something external like ChatGPT, or you can do it all in Citadel. Feel free to come back with any questions or anything you'd like to discuss further! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hey Zg!
You’re already thinking about this in the right shape. Citadel is built for exactly this kind of human-led, multi-agent workflow. The main difference is that it gives the handoff, memory, routing, and verification a repo-native structure instead of leaving you to maintain a custom
agent-exchangesfolder.You can bring your existing ChatGPT planning phase into Citadel, or you can run the whole loop inside Citadel. If you want the Citadel-only version, I’d map your current phases like this:
.planning/intake/plus a campaign brief./do, a campaign p…