-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Article to help setup an Azure AI Foundry agent with SPE #10475
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 5c5f27b: 💡 Validation status: suggestions
docs/embedded/development/declarative-agent/spe-knowledge-retrieval.md
For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Your PR may contain errors or warnings or suggestions unrelated to the files you changed. This happens when external dependencies like GitHub alias, Microsoft alias, cross repo links are updated. Please use these instructions to resolve them. |
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
|
Adding a new page that guides the steps needed to make SPE ready for Foundry agent. |
docs/embedded/development/declarative-agent/spe-knowledge-retrieval.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/embedded/development/declarative-agent/spe-knowledge-retrieval.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dluces
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to fix some links
|
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft" |
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit b289081: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
- Rename file from spe-knowledge-retrieval.md to sharepoint-embedded-knowledge-source.md to avoid abbreviation issues - Replace absolute Microsoft Learn links with relative links - Remove view parameters from Graph API documentation links
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 7d944cb: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
- Updated the title and description for clarity and consistency. - Adjusted prerequisites and API call instructions for better readability. - spell out acronym before using it `(SPE)` - corrected msgraph reference - rephrased statements to be less conversational - don't use `aka.ms` links to internal docs (bypasses automatic link checking to avoid 404's)
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
andrewconnell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will merge once build check completes with no errors from my edits. Don't believe it's "Microsoft Foundry" as referenced in the title... believe it's "Azure AI Foundry"... and thus the title, description, and body of the article should be updated, but I'm not privvy to Ignite announcements so defer to author
|
Learn Build status updates of commit abfb649: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
Category
Related issues
What's in this Pull Request?
A new help article to grant a Foundry app access to an SPE container type