Skip to content

Comparison

SHEPDESIGN edited this page Jul 20, 2026 · 3 revisions

Comparison

HOF vs the other guys. Honest takes only.

Note

This is a positioning document by the HOF team. We try to be fair, but we're not unbiased. Verify claims for yourself.

the landscape

The WordPress facet-filter space has been dominated by two paid plugins for years:

  • FacetWP — the workhorse. Mature, stable, expensive.
  • WP Grid Builder — newer, prettier UI, also paid.
  • Search & Filter Pro — solid for simple sites.

HOF enters with a specific bet: modern stack, open core, dev-friendly, fair pricing.

quick comparison

Competitor pricing verified July 2026.

hooked on facets FacetWP WP Grid Builder
Frontend stack Vanilla JS — zero runtime dependencies jQuery jQuery + custom
Admin UI React 18 SPA Custom PHP/jQuery React (partial)
Architecture PSR-4 + Composer Procedural-heavy OOP, mixed
Ask — AI natural-language facet ✅ Pro
Visual DNA — perceptual color matching ✅ Pro
Swipe deck facet ✅ Pro
Spin-the-wheel facet ✅ Pro
Intersection matrix facet ✅ Pro
Comparison bin facet ✅ Pro
Open source core
Free version on WordPress.org ✅ (planned listing)
Pricing Free core · Pro $99–$399/yr, renewals 50% off $99–$499/yr, renewals 20% off, limited free trial $49–$249/yr
Dev environment included ✅ docker-compose
Live URL state
Indexed queries
WooCommerce focus First-class Strong Strong
Page builder support Gutenberg, Bricks, Elementor, Divi, Breakdance All major All major
Multilingual Planned
Last major rewrite Built fresh 2025+ 2017 era 2020 era

where HOF wins (or aims to)

  • Zero-framework frontend. The public runtime is dependency-free vanilla JS (~9kb gzipped) — no jQuery, no framework, nothing to conflict with your theme's stack.
  • Facets nobody else ships. Ask (natural language → filters) and Visual DNA (perceptual CIELAB color matching) don't exist anywhere else in this space — plus swipe deck, spin-the-wheel, intersection matrix, and the comparison bin.
  • Developer experience. PSR-4, Composer, real namespaces, Vite, HMR, Docker dev env.
  • Theme-ability. CSS custom properties everywhere. No !important arms race.
  • Openness. Core is open source. You can read the indexer, audit it, fix it.

where the others win (today)

  • FacetWP: maturity. Years of edge cases handled. A vast user base. Bulletproof.
  • WPGB: visual polish. The admin UI is genuinely gorgeous. Their card builder is strong.
  • Both: integrations. Years of integration work with every page builder, theme, CPT plugin.

HOF is new. We don't pretend to match FacetWP's edge-case coverage on day one. We're betting that modern stack + open core + good defaults gets us competitive faster than they can modernize.

who should pick what

If you... Pick
Need it working in production today FacetWP
Want the slickest admin UI WP Grid Builder
Are building a new project and want modern code hooked on facets
Want open source you can audit and extend hooked on facets
Run a dev shop and value DX hooked on facets
Need WPML / Polylang on day one FacetWP or WPGB (HOF planned)

migration

Automated migration tools are on the post-1.0 roadmap. The planned scope:

Clone this wiki locally