feat: allow width customisation and persist it across users and view

[SagarRajput-7]

Summary

Under this feature we have implemented the following:

• Added resize table to list and table panel
• added logic to persist the updated column width across view, it will retain across the below conditions
  • cloning the panel, width preference will be shared
  • customised during edit and new panel process
  • Customisation on the dashboard view - [Detail, full view and CRUD view]
  • Persist across - refreshes, re-login
  • preference will affect across users

Related Issues / PR's

• Allow column width customization and persiste b/w views and users. #6932

Screenshots

Affected Areas and Manually Tested Areas

• Table and list panels
• resize component had now a minConstraint so will not be shorten beyond 150px

---

Important

Add column width customization and persistence across users and views in table components.

• Behavior:
  • Add column width customization to ResizeTable and persist across sessions and users.
  • Column width settings persist through refreshes, re-logins, and are shared when panels are cloned.
  • Affects views: Detail, full view, CRUD view.
• Components:
  • Update ResizeTable to handle column resizing and persistence logic.
  • Modify ResizableHeader to include a minimum width constraint of 150px.
  • Integrate ResizeTable in CeleryOverviewTable, LogsPanelComponent, TracesTableComponent, and QueryTable.
• Styles:
  • Add styles in ResizeTable.styles.scss for resize handles and headers.
• Dashboard Context:
  • Add columnWidths state to DashboardProvider to manage column width settings.
  • Update GraphLayout and NewWidget to handle column width changes.
• Tests:
  • Update tests in AlertChannels.test.tsx and AlertChannelsNormalUser.test.tsx to mock necessary hooks and components.

^{This description was created by for a627e19. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to b0bbe6d in 2 minutes and 33 seconds

More details

• Looked at 444 lines of code in 16 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 25 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/providers/Dashboard/types.ts:13

• Draft comment:
  This type is functionally identical to the existing Record<string, Record<string, number>> type. Consider using the existing type signature instead of creating a new alias.

• columnWidths parameter type (utils.ts)

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment is about a newly added type definition. The evidence shows that there is indeed an existing usage of an equivalent type. Having consistent type definitions across the codebase is good practice. However, having a named type can improve code readability and self-documentation compared to using a raw Record type.
  The named type might actually be better for code clarity and documentation. Also, we don't know if there are other files using this new type definition.
  While consistency is important, introducing a named type can improve code readability and make the codebase more maintainable, even if it's functionally identical to an existing Record type.
  The comment should be deleted. The new named type WidgetColumnWidths adds value through improved readability and self-documentation, even though it's functionally identical to the existing Record type.

2. frontend/src/components/NewWidget/index.tsx:738

• Draft comment:
  Avoid using inline style for icon colors. Instead of hardcoding '#fdd600', use a design token or predefined color constant to ensure consistency with the app’s theme.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

3. frontend/src/components/CeleryOverview/CeleryOverviewTable/CeleryOverviewTable.tsx:524

• Draft comment:
  The change from scroll={{ x: true }} to scroll={{ x: 'max-content' }} is clear; ensure that this value is consistent with design guidelines and works well for all data sets.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

4. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.tsx:43

• Draft comment:
  Great use of debounce to update column widths. Ensure the 1000ms delay meets your UX requirements; consider whether users might expect a faster update.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

5. frontend/src/container/QueryTable/QueryTable.tsx:99

• Draft comment:
  Passing 'widgetId' and enabling 'shouldPersistColumnWidths' in ResizeTable is aligned with the new feature. Verify that this behavior is consistent across all table components.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

6. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:536

• Draft comment:
  Adding 'key', 'ellipsis', and 'responsive' properties to table columns improves consistency. Verify that these properties are in line with existing design tokens if available.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

7. frontend/src/providers/Dashboard/Dashboard.tsx:417

• Draft comment:
  The Dashboard context now includes columnWidths and setColumnWidths; ensure that other parts of the application properly consume and update these values to prevent potential state sync issues.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50%
  None

8. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:513

• Draft comment:
  Consider using a stable key for each row instead of generating a new UUID on every render. Changing keys frequently may trigger unnecessary re-renders.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

9. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.tsx:43

• Draft comment:
  Consider cleaning up the debounced update function on unmount by calling updateAllColumnWidths.cancel() in a cleanup effect to avoid potential memory leaks.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
  While it's technically true that debounced functions should be cleaned up, this is a minor optimization. The function is stored in a useRef which means it won't be recreated on rerenders. The debounced function would be garbage collected when the component unmounts anyway. The potential memory impact would be minimal - at worst a single timeout that would be cleared by the browser.
  The comment does point to a real React best practice of cleaning up effects. Not cleaning up could theoretically cause issues if the component rapidly mounts/unmounts.
  While it's a valid best practice, the real-world impact here is negligible. The cleanup would be more code complexity for minimal benefit.
  The comment should be removed as it suggests adding complexity for a theoretical issue that would have minimal real-world impact.

10. frontend/src/components/QueryTable/QueryTable.tsx:101

• Draft comment:
  Ensure that the new 'widgetId' prop is always defined when persisting column widths. Consider adding stricter TypeScript checks if 'widgetId' is required for width persistence.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

11. frontend/src/providers/Dashboard/Dashboard.tsx:420

• Draft comment:
  The dependency array for constructing the Dashboard context value is very large. Review if all dependencies are necessary for performance optimization or consider splitting context to limit re-renders.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was on unchanged code.

12. frontend/src/components/CeleryOverview/CeleryOverviewTable/CeleryOverviewTable.tsx:90

• Draft comment:
  Inline styles are used in the filter dropdown for padding. Consider extracting these styles into a CSS class or using design tokens for consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

13. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:138

• Draft comment:
  Avoid using inline style objects for dynamic color styling; consider using predefined design tokens or CSS classes to ensure consistency across the app.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

14. frontend/src/container/QueryTable/QueryTable.tsx:65

• Draft comment:
  The table search filter is applied immediately on every keystroke. Consider debouncing the search input to improve performance with large datasets.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

15. frontend/src/components/CeleryOverview/CeleryOverviewTable/CeleryOverviewTable.tsx:124

• Draft comment:
  The button label 'close' on line 124 appears in lowercase while the other action buttons ('Search', 'Reset') use initial capitalization. Consider changing it to 'Close' for consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

16. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/types.ts:8

• Draft comment:
  Typo detected in the import statement at line 8: './contants'. Consider renaming it to './constants' if this isn't intentional.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

17. frontend/src/container/GridCardLayout/GridCardLayout.tsx:51

• Draft comment:
  Typo detected: The import path './WidgetHeader/contants' likely should be './WidgetHeader/constants'. Please correct the typo to avoid confusion and maintain consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was on unchanged code.

18. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:6

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: The module import path 'QueryTable.intefaces' seems to have a typo. Consider renaming it to 'QueryTable.interfaces' for clarity and consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

19. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:181

• Draft comment:
  Typographical/grammatical suggestion: The comment 'is the column is the value column then we need to check for the available legend' could be rephrased as 'If the column is a value column, then we need to check for an available legend.' This would improve readability.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

20. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:25

• Draft comment:
  Typo: The directory 'dashbaordVariables' appears to be misspelled. Consider renaming it to 'dashboardVariables' if that is the intended word.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

21. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:53

• Draft comment:
  Typo: 'timePreferance' seems to be a misspelling of 'timePreference'. Consider correcting it throughout the code for consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

22. frontend/src/container/QueryTable/QueryTable.intefaces.ts:1

• Draft comment:
  It appears that the filename 'QueryTable.intefaces.ts' might contain a typographical error. Consider renaming the file to 'QueryTable.interfaces.ts' to correct the spelling of 'interfaces'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

23. frontend/src/container/QueryTable/QueryTable.tsx:13

• Draft comment:
  Typo in the import statement: 'QueryTable.intefaces' should be corrected to 'QueryTable.interfaces' to maintain proper naming conventions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

24. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:11

• Draft comment:
  Typo: In the import statement on line 11, 'QueryTable.intefaces' appears to have a typographical error. Consider renaming it to 'QueryTable.interfaces' for clarity.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

25. frontend/src/types/api/dashboard/getAll.ts:97

• Draft comment:
  Typo found: The property 'timePreferance' in the IBaseWidget interface should be updated to 'timePreference' to match the imported type 'timePreferenceType' and ensure consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_ozleyBDEnENmrVTa

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 8fa427d in 2 minutes and 3 seconds

More details

• Looked at 161 lines of code in 5 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 10 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizableHeader.tsx:24

• Draft comment:
  Consider using design tokens or predefined class names for styling instead of hardcoding the class name. This ensures consistency with the app's theme.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50%
  None

2. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizableHeader.tsx:36

• Draft comment:
  Ensure consistent styling by using design tokens instead of hard-coded class names if available.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50%
  None

3. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.tsx:58

• Draft comment:
  Good use of preventDefault and stopPropagation in handleResize, ensuring event isolation during column resizing.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

4. frontend/src/container/LogsPanelTable/LogsPanelComponent.tsx:82

• Draft comment:
  Memoizing columns with widget as dependency might miss updates if only selectedLogFields changes. Consider being more specific in dependencies.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50%
  None

5. frontend/src/container/TracesTableComponent/TracesTableComponent.tsx:57

• Draft comment:
  Similar to LogsPanelComponent, the useMemo for columns depends on [widget]. If possible, narrow dependencies to just the fields used (e.g., widget.selectedTracesFields) to avoid unnecessary recalculations.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50%
  None

6. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizableHeader.tsx:36

• Draft comment:
  Merge any incoming className from restProps with 'resizable-header' instead of replacing it.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

7. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.tsx:58

• Draft comment:
  Add a brief comment explaining why e.preventDefault() and e.stopPropagation() are used in handleResize.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  This comment is asking the PR author to explain their code, which violates the rule against asking for explanations or confirmations. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a potential issue with the code.

8. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.tsx:50

• Draft comment:
  Review the 1000ms debounce delay in updateAllColumnWidths to ensure it meets UX and performance requirements.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

9. frontend/src/container/TracesTableComponent/TracesTableComponent.tsx:64

• Draft comment:
  Optimize useMemo dependency: depend on specific fields (e.g., widget.selectedTracesFields and formatTimezoneAdjustedTimestamp) instead of the entire widget object.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

10. frontend/src/container/LogsPanelTable/LogsPanelComponent.tsx:135

• Draft comment:
  Consider renaming 'isOrderByTimeStamp' to 'isOrderByTimestamp' to maintain consistency with the naming (e.g., the 'timestamp' string used later). This small tweak can help avoid confusion and ensure uniform style.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_A2WmUxnMzXAbRlLE

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on cc5e4bd in 1 minute and 52 seconds

More details

• Looked at 43 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/container/GridCardLayout/GridCardLayout.tsx:242

• Draft comment:
  Ensure all external values used in the effect are in the dependency array. For example, 'layouts' and 'selectedDashboard' are referenced in the logic but not listed as dependencies. This may lead to stale values if they change.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was on unchanged code.

2. frontend/src/container/GridCardLayout/GridCardLayout.tsx:241

• Draft comment:
  The early-return guard now uses variables (isDashboardLocked, saveLayoutPermission, updateDashboardMutation.isLoading, isDashboardFetching) that aren’t in the dependency array. Ensure their omission is intentional or add them to the dependencies to avoid stale closures.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment is technically correct - these variables are used but not in the dependency array. However, this appears to be intentional. The variables are only used in the guard clause to prevent unnecessary saves. If they were added to the dependency array, it would trigger the save logic whenever these status flags change, which is not the desired behavior. The save should only happen when the actual layout or column widths change.
  I could be wrong about the intention - maybe changes to these variables should trigger a re-evaluation of whether to save. For example, if isDashboardLocked changes from true to false, maybe we do want to check if a save is needed.
  After considering the critique, I still believe this is intentional. The guard variables are status flags that should only prevent saves, not trigger them. If isDashboardLocked changes from true to false, the next layout/columnWidth change will trigger a save if needed.
  The comment should be deleted. The missing dependencies appear to be an intentional design choice to only trigger saves on actual data changes, not status flag changes.

3. frontend/src/container/GridCardLayout/GridCardLayout.tsx:252

• Draft comment:
  The split between shouldSaveLayout and shouldSaveColumnWidths improves readability. Verify that the new combined save condition meets the intended update behavior.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 20% <= threshold 50%
  None

4. frontend/src/container/GridCardLayout/GridCardLayout.tsx:51

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: The import from './WidgetHeader/contants' appears to have a typo. Consider renaming it to './WidgetHeader/constants' to keep naming consistent.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_Augmg6xm5IL1lEHe

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on caab1bb in 1 minute and 16 seconds

More details

• Looked at 27 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 6 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:190

• Draft comment:
  Removing 'ellipsis' and 'key' may affect cell overflow and unique key identification. Ensure these changes are intentional and handled via CSS or alternative mechanisms.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment violates several rules: 1) It's speculative with "may affect" 2) It asks for verification with "Ensure these changes are intentional" 3) It doesn't point out a clear required code change 4) Without seeing the actual UI or how these properties are used elsewhere, we can't be certain there's an issue. The key prop might be handled at a higher level, and ellipsis might be controlled via CSS.
  I might be overlooking potential accessibility or React performance implications of removing these properties. The key property in particular is important for React's reconciliation.
  While these properties can be important, the comment is still speculative and asks for verification rather than pointing out a definite issue. If there were actual problems, they would be immediately visible in the UI or cause React warnings.
  The comment should be deleted as it's speculative, asks for verification, and doesn't point out a clear required code change.

2. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:536

• Draft comment:
  Removed 'key' and 'ellipsis' properties from column config. Confirm that unique keys are managed elsewhere and overflow is handled properly.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment looked like it was already resolved.

3. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:190

• Draft comment:
  Removed 'ellipsis' and 'key' props. Please ensure that omitting text truncation (ellipsis) is intentional and that relying on dataIndex for unique keys doesn’t cause React key warnings.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

4. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:539

• Draft comment:
  Removed 'key' and 'ellipsis' properties from the column config. Verify that this doesn’t negatively affect cell text overflow handling or key uniqueness for React lists.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

5. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:6

• Draft comment:
  Typo detected in the import statement: 'container/QueryTable/QueryTable.intefaces' should be corrected to 'container/QueryTable/QueryTable.interfaces'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:11

• Draft comment:
  Typo detected: The import statement on line 11 uses 'QueryTable.intefaces'. This likely should be 'QueryTable.interfaces'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_Z7WHsA4lkHGedE33

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a3e8279 in 1 minute and 27 seconds

More details

• Looked at 27 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 7 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:190

• Draft comment:
  Removal of 'ellipsis' may affect column text overflow handling. Verify if this is intentional for custom width support and if text truncation is managed elsewhere.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment violates several rules: 1) It asks for verification ("Verify if...") which is explicitly forbidden 2) It's speculative about potential issues rather than pointing out a definite problem 3) It's about UI/styling which we're told to assume the author handled correctly 4) It doesn't suggest a clear action, just asks for confirmation.
  The ellipsis property could be an important UX consideration for table cell content, and its removal might cause text overflow issues.
  Per the rules, we should assume UI and styling changes were made intentionally and correctly. Additionally, asking for verification is explicitly forbidden.
  The comment should be deleted as it violates multiple review rules - it's speculative, asks for verification, and concerns UI styling which we're told to trust the author on.

2. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:539

• Draft comment:
  Removed 'ellipsis' property could affect column rendering in terms of text overflow; ensure this is desired. Also, removal of key may affect React's reconciliation, check if key is provided elsewhere.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
  For key: React keys are important for reconciliation, but the dataIndex property can serve as a unique key since it's unique per column. For ellipsis: this is a UI styling concern about text truncation, which falls under UI/styling changes that we're told to ignore. The comment is speculative ("could affect") rather than pointing out a definite issue.
  The comment raises valid technical points about React keys and text overflow behavior. Maybe there's a specific reason these properties were needed.
  However, the rules explicitly state to ignore UI/styling changes and to not make speculative comments. The key property is not strictly necessary since dataIndex serves the same purpose.
  The comment should be deleted as it's speculative and primarily about UI styling, which we're told to ignore.

3. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:190

• Draft comment:
  Removed 'ellipsis: true' and 'key: item.name'. Ensure this removal is intentional to avoid affecting text truncation and unique column identification required by the AntD Table.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment asks to "ensure" and verify intention, which violates our rules. It's speculative and asking for confirmation rather than pointing out a definite issue. While these properties are commonly used in AntD tables, their necessity depends on specific requirements. The key property is often auto-generated by AntD if not specified.
  The properties could be important for table functionality - ellipsis prevents text overflow and keys help React with reconciliation. Maybe this is a real issue?
  While these properties can be useful, the comment violates our rules by asking for verification rather than stating a clear issue. If these properties were truly required, it would cause obvious UI issues that would be caught during testing.
  Delete this comment as it violates our rules against asking for verification and making speculative comments. If these properties are truly required, it would become apparent during testing.

4. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:536

• Draft comment:
  Removed 'key: item.dataIndex' and 'ellipsis: true'. Confirm that unique keys and proper text overflow handling are provided elsewhere to avoid potential React warnings or UI issues.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
  The key property on columns is different from row keys - column keys are optional in antd Table when dataIndex is provided. Row keys are what matter for React's reconciliation, and those are handled via uuid(). Ellipsis is purely a UI styling concern for text overflow. Neither removal seems to cause actual functional issues.
  The comment raises valid questions about React keys and UI behavior. Could there be edge cases where these properties were important for specific functionality?
  The dataIndex property serves as a unique identifier for columns, and row keys are properly handled. Text overflow can be handled via CSS if needed.
  This comment should be deleted as it's speculative and doesn't identify a clear issue - the changes appear safe and the removed properties weren't essential.

5. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:6

• Draft comment:
  Typo: The word in the import 'QueryTable.intefaces' appears to be misspelled. It should likely be 'QueryTable.interfaces'. This correction will help maintain consistency and prevent future confusion.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:169

• Draft comment:
  Typo in comment: The comment on line 169 uses 'localecompare' but the correct method is 'localeCompare' (with an uppercase C) as used in the code. Consider updating the comment for clarity.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

7. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:11

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: the filename in the import statement 'container/QueryTable/QueryTable.intefaces' appears to be misspelled. It should probably be 'QueryTable.interfaces'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_JN0faiwWaQkc2zVR

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 7aed4de in 1 minute and 12 seconds

More details

• Looked at 27 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.styles.scss:7

• Draft comment:
  Ensure that nesting .ant-table-column-title under .resizable-header is intentional and doesn’t conflict with other components’ styles.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

2. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizableHeader.tsx:29

• Draft comment:
  Consider extracting the hardcoded '150' (min width) into a constant for maintainability in case it needs to be adjusted later.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

3. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.styles.scss:7

• Draft comment:
  Verify that the nested '.ant-table-column-title' styles are properly scoped and align with your design tokens if available.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
  None

Workflow ID: wflow_tUOVZ4r9vPv9bWFB

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9e50d54 in 1 minute and 25 seconds

More details

• Looked at 20 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/container/GridCardLayout/GridCardLayout.tsx:258

• Draft comment:
  The new check for dashboardLayout (ensuring it's an array with >0 length) is added for shouldSaveColumnWidths. Verify that tying column widths persistence to the existence of a non-empty dashboardLayout is intentional, as column width updates might be independent of layout changes.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment is asking for verification of intent, which violates our rules. It's speculative and asking the author to confirm their intention. The checks appear to be defensive programming to prevent errors when dashboardLayout is undefined/empty. This is a reasonable safeguard.
  The comment raises a valid architectural question about coupling column width persistence with layout existence. Perhaps these should be independent.
  While the architectural point is interesting, the comment is phrased as a verification request rather than a clear suggestion for improvement. The defensive checks are a reasonable safeguard against errors.
  Delete this comment as it violates our rule against asking authors to verify intent. If there's a strong architectural reason to decouple these, it should be raised as a clear suggestion rather than a verification request.

2. frontend/src/container/GridCardLayout/GridCardLayout.tsx:255

• Draft comment:
  The new guard adds a check to ensure dashboardLayout is a non-empty array before calling hasColumnWidthsChanged. This extra validation is consistent with the logic for shouldSaveLayout. If dashboardLayout is always initialized as an array, the Array.isArray check might be redundant; consider refactoring these repeated validations into a helper if used in multiple places.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
  Looking at the code, dashboardLayout is initialized as an array on line 86 with useState<Layout[]>([]). This means the Array.isArray check is indeed redundant since TypeScript ensures it's always an array. The validation pattern is repeated in both places, suggesting a helper function could reduce duplication. However, the comment is more of an observation than a clear action item.
  The comment doesn't provide a clear action item or specific suggestion for improvement. It's more of an observation than a directive for change.
  While the observation is technically correct, without a specific suggestion for improvement or clear evidence that this is causing problems, it falls into the category of speculative comments that don't require immediate action.
  The comment should be deleted as it's more of an observation than an actionable item, and it doesn't clearly demonstrate why the current code needs to change.

3. frontend/src/container/GridCardLayout/GridCardLayout.tsx:51

• Draft comment:
  Typo: 'contants' should be corrected to 'constants' in the import statement on line 51.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_ji7hawaGSLlLhowK

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 4dc10e3 in 1 minute and 36 seconds

More details

• Looked at 20 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 5 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:239

• Draft comment:
  Avoid disabling react-hooks/exhaustive-deps without a strong justification. The inline eslint disable may hide issues with stale closures if 'selectedWidget' changes.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment appears to be correct - selectedWidget.id is used inside the effect to access columnWidths, but selectedWidget is not included in the dependency array. This could lead to stale closures. However, there may be a reason for excluding it - including it could potentially cause an infinite loop since the effect updates selectedWidget state. The current code seems intentionally structured this way.
  I may be missing some complex state management patterns that make the current setup necessary. The infinite loop concern could be a red herring - there might be a better way to structure this that avoids both issues.
  While the comment identifies a real issue, removing the eslint-disable without restructuring the component could cause problems. The current structure, while not ideal, may be intentionally avoiding state update loops.
  The comment identifies a legitimate issue but the suggested fix could cause more problems. This needs a more thoughtful refactoring rather than just removing the eslint-disable.

2. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:259

• Draft comment:
  Removing 'selectedWidget' from the dependency array can lead to potential stale data issues if its value changes. Confirm that this omission is deliberate and safe.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to confirm their intention regarding the omission of selectedWidget from the dependency array. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or ensure behavior is intended. Therefore, this comment should be removed.

3. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:25

• Draft comment:
  Typo: In the import statement, 'dashbaordVariables' seems to be misspelled. It should likely be 'dashboardVariables' to maintain consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

4. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:274

• Draft comment:
  Typo: The term 'timePreferance' is likely intended to be 'timePreference'. Consider updating its spelling throughout the file.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

5. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:588

• Draft comment:
  Typo in comment: The word 'loose' should be 'lose' in the phrase 'we do not want that as we loose out on superset functionalities'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_5CK1oECFxzk2cl8O

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 1088602 in 1 minute and 35 seconds

More details

• Looked at 20 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 6 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:258

• Draft comment:
  Avoid removing 'selectedWidget' from the dependency array if it's used inside the effect (e.g. for columnWidths lookup). Consider using 'prev' (the current state in the updater) instead of referencing 'selectedWidget' directly, to ensure correct and consistent updates.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

2. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:239

• Draft comment:
  Consider documenting why 'selectedWidget' is intentionally omitted from the dependency array and suppressing the lint rule. This helps future maintainers understand the reasoning behind it.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment raises a valid point - there is an omitted dependency with an eslint-disable but no explanation. However, the suggested documentation is speculative about preventing re-renders being the reason. Without knowing the actual reason for omitting the dependency, adding potentially incorrect documentation could be misleading. The safer approach would be to either include the dependency or have the team investigate why it was omitted.
  I may be being too conservative - documenting even a plausible reason could be better than no documentation at all. And preventing re-renders is a common reason for omitting deps.
  While some documentation is better than none, incorrect documentation is worse than none. Without clear evidence of the actual reason for omitting the dep, we shouldn't speculate in the code comments.
  The comment should be deleted. While documenting omitted dependencies is good practice, we should not add speculative documentation without knowing the actual reason for the omission.

3. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:259

• Draft comment:
  Removing 'selectedWidget' from the dependency array may result in stale values if it changes. Verify that this omission is intentional and consider extracting only necessary properties if possible.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment looked like it was already resolved.

4. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:25

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: The folder name 'dashbaordVariables' appears to be misspelled. It should likely be 'dashboardVariables'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

5. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:53

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: 'timePreferance' seems to be a misspelling. Consider renaming it to 'timePreference' for clarity and consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. frontend/src/container/NewWidget/index.tsx:597

• Draft comment:
  Typographical issues in comment: In the comment block (lines 595-600), 'loose' should be 'lose' and 'begining' should be 'beginning'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_cbxVH3xPYlMSnHWF

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 44d44e7 in 1 minute and 25 seconds

More details

• Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.styles.scss:10

• Draft comment:
  Changing 'overflow' from auto to hidden will prevent scrollbars and clip content. Confirm that truncating text with ellipsis is the intended behavior, as this might hide important content.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  This comment violates several rules: 1) It asks for confirmation of intention ("Confirm that...") which is explicitly forbidden 2) It's about UI styling which we should assume the author got right 3) The presence of text-overflow: ellipsis suggests this was a deliberate choice for handling overflow 4) The comment is speculative about "might hide important content"
  The change could potentially impact usability if the table headers contain critical information that shouldn't be truncated.
  Since this is a UI styling change and we have a rule to trust the author on UI decisions, plus the explicit rule against asking for confirmation, this comment should still be removed.
  Delete this comment as it violates multiple review rules - it asks for confirmation, discusses UI styling, and is speculative.

2. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.styles.scss:10

• Draft comment:
  Changing 'overflow' from 'auto' to 'hidden' prevents scrollbars, which is typical for ellipsis truncation. However, ellipsis usually works with 'white-space: nowrap'. Verify that the current combination with 'white-space: normal' is intended and does not lead to inadvertent clipping of multiline headers.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  The comment violates several rules: 1) It asks for verification ("Verify that...") 2) It's speculative about potential issues 3) It's about UI styling which we're supposed to assume the author got right 4) The comment isn't definitively pointing out a clear issue that needs fixing.
  The combination of these CSS properties might actually cause real functional issues with text truncation, and this could be a legitimate technical concern.
  While the technical concern might be valid, our rules explicitly state to trust the author on UI/styling changes and not to ask for verification. The author likely tested this combination.
  The comment should be deleted as it violates multiple rules, particularly around UI styling trust and verification requests.

Workflow ID: wflow_ZilffhNQgMC9uxl9

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 621692a in 1 minute and 31 seconds

More details

• Looked at 24 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 7 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:190

• Draft comment:
  Remove commented-out ellipsis property. Consider cleaning up if not needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment looked like it was already resolved.

2. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:538

• Draft comment:
  Remove commented-out ellipsis property to clean up code.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment looked like it was already resolved.

3. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:190

• Draft comment:
  Removed commented-out ellipsis property. Clean-up is fine; ensure you don't need text truncation behavior for better readability.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

4. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:539

• Draft comment:
  Removed commented-out ellipsis property from column config. Confirm that text overflow is handled as needed, possibly via CSS if required.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

5. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:6

• Draft comment:
  Typo found: In the import statement on line 6, 'QueryTable.intefaces' appears to be a misspelling. It should likely be 'QueryTable.interfaces'. Please update the filename accordingly.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:11

• Draft comment:
  Typo detected: The file path 'QueryTable.intefaces' in the import should likely be changed to 'QueryTable.interfaces' if it matches the convention used elsewhere. This is a trivial, cosmetic issue.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

7. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:415

• Draft comment:
  Typographical note: The variable name 'seria' is used in the code (e.g., in fillDataFromSeries). Consider renaming it to 'series' or 'serie' for clarity, as 'series' is generally used as both singular and plural. This is a trivial, cosmetic issue.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_9SIq7F2czI63tuI5

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 1f95f25 in 43 seconds

More details

• Looked at 59 lines of code in 3 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 10 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.tsx:38

• Draft comment:
  Optional chaining updated to include 'data'? Ensure that the widget structure always has a 'data' property to avoid undefined errors.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

2. frontend/src/container/AllAlertChannels/__tests__/AlertChannels.test.tsx:24

• Draft comment:
  Properly mock useLocation using ROUTES constant; ensure environment variables like FRONTEND_API_ENDPOINT are reliably set in tests.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

3. frontend/src/container/AllAlertChannels/__tests__/AlertChannelsNormalUser.test.tsx:29

• Draft comment:
  Mocking useLocation here mirrors the main test file; ensure consistency, and check that process.env.FRONTEND_API_ENDPOINT and ROUTES are correctly defined in test environments.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

4. frontend/src/components/ResizeTable/ResizeTable.tsx:38

• Draft comment:
  Optional chaining improved: added a missing check on selectedDashboard?.data to safely access widgets. This prevents runtime errors when data is undefined.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  This comment is purely informative, as it only describes what the code change does without providing any actionable feedback or suggestions. It doesn't ask for confirmation or suggest improvements.

5. frontend/src/container/AllAlertChannels/__tests__/AlertChannels.test.tsx:24

• Draft comment:
  Good use of the ROUTES constant for constructing the pathname. Ensure that process.env.FRONTEND_API_ENDPOINT is reliably set in the test environment.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

6. frontend/src/container/AllAlertChannels/__tests__/AlertChannelsNormalUser.test.tsx:29

• Draft comment:
  Consistent mocking of useLocation with ROUTES is maintained here as well. Verify that the environment variable is properly set so tests run as expected.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
  None

7. frontend/src/container/AllAlertChannels/__tests__/AlertChannels.test.tsx:42

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: The word 'visble' in the test description should be corrected to 'visible'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

8. frontend/src/container/AllAlertChannels/__tests__/AlertChannels.test.tsx:45

• Draft comment:
  Typographical inconsistency: The test description on this line appears to start a quote before tooltip_notification_channels but doesn't properly close it. Consider reviewing the quotation marks for consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

9. frontend/src/container/AllAlertChannels/__tests__/AlertChannelsNormalUser.test.tsx:48

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: 'visble' should be corrected to 'visible'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

10. frontend/src/container/AllAlertChannels/__tests__/AlertChannelsNormalUser.test.tsx:55

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: The test description on line 55 seems to have an unclosed quotation mark near 'tooltip_notification_channels'. Please ensure that the string is correctly quoted.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_KTaiR6kcWoSMdJ9B

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a627e19 in 1 minute and 18 seconds

More details

• Looked at 88 lines of code in 3 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 10 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:190

• Draft comment:
  Removal of the 'responsive: ["md"]' property may impact mobile responsiveness. Confirm this change is intentional and that the table renders correctly on smaller screens.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 40% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to confirm their intention regarding the removal of a property related to responsiveness. This violates the rule against asking for confirmation of intention. However, it does point out a potential issue with mobile responsiveness, which could be useful. I need to decide if the potential usefulness outweighs the rule violation.

2. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:539

• Draft comment:
  The 'responsive: ["md"]' option was removed from the column configuration. Verify that this change is in line with the desired responsiveness across all devices.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  This comment is asking the PR author to verify their change, which is against the rules. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a clear issue with the code.

3. frontend/src/container/PanelWrapper/__tests__/__snapshots__/TablePanelWrapper.test.tsx.snap:9

• Draft comment:
  Snapshot updates reflect changes in class names (e.g., 'react-resizable-handle' to 'resize-handle') and added margins. Ensure these class name changes are consistently updated in the corresponding CSS files and consider using design tokens for spacing values.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

4. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:190

• Draft comment:
  Removed the 'responsive' property from the column definition. Ensure this change is intentional and that table responsiveness is managed appropriately (e.g., via CSS) for smaller screens.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  This comment violates several rules. First, it asks to "ensure" something, which is explicitly forbidden. Second, it's speculative about potential issues with responsiveness. Third, it doesn't point out a clear problem that needs fixing - it's just asking for verification. The removal of the responsive property might be intentional and the team might have a different approach for handling responsiveness.
  The responsive property might be important for mobile views, and removing it could cause layout issues. The comment does suggest an alternative approach with CSS.
  While mobile responsiveness is important, the comment doesn't identify a clear issue - it's just asking for verification and making suggestions. Per our rules, we should not keep comments that ask for verification or make speculative suggestions.
  Delete this comment as it violates multiple rules: it asks for verification, is speculative, and doesn't point out a clear issue that needs fixing.

5. frontend/src/PanelWrapper/__tests__/__snapshots__/TablePanelWrapper.test.tsx.snap:59

• Draft comment:
  Snapshot updated to reflect new CSS class names (e.g., 'resize-main-table', 'resizable-header', 'resize-handle') and added margins. Ensure these CSS changes are maintained in external stylesheets using design tokens as needed.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:539

• Draft comment:
  Removed the 'responsive' property from the table column configuration. Confirm that responsiveness is handled as intended (e.g., via CSS) and that this removal doesn't negatively impact the UI on different devices.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to confirm that the removal of the 'responsive' property is handled correctly and doesn't negatively impact the UI. This falls under asking the author to ensure behavior is intended, which is against the rules.

7. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:6

• Draft comment:
  Typo detected: 'QueryTable.intefaces' might be a typo. Consider renaming it to 'QueryTable.interfaces' to improve code clarity.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

8. frontend/src/container/GridTableComponent/utils.ts:150

• Draft comment:
  Minor typographical issue in comment: "assumption :- number values is bigger than 'n/a'" could be rephrased for clarity, e.g., "Assumption: numeric values are larger than 'n/a'". While this is a comment and non-functional, improving its wording could aid readability.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

9. frontend/src/container/PanelWrapper/__tests__/__snapshots__/TablePanelWrapper.test.tsx.snap:3

• Draft comment:
  Typo found: 'wrappper' should be corrected to 'wrapper' in the snapshot export name on line 3.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

10. frontend/src/lib/query/createTableColumnsFromQuery.ts:11

• Draft comment:
  Typo detected: In the import statement on line 11, 'QueryTable.intefaces' appears to be a misspelling. It should be corrected to 'QueryTable.interfaces' to avoid confusion.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_4hRE62b8YjOdb3iW

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.