Add ConditionalWeakTable.Remove(key, out value) polyfill - #576
Merged
Conversation
Fixes #574 The two-argument Remove overload only became public in .NET 10, so the polyfill applies to all targets below that. Implemented as TryGetValue followed by Remove. Noted in the api list that this is not atomic with regard to concurrent mutations, since the lookup and removal do not share the table lock.
This was referenced Aug 12, 2026
This was referenced Aug 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #574
The two-argument Remove overload only became public in .NET 10, so the polyfill applies to all targets below that.
Implemented as TryGetValue followed by Remove. Noted in the api list that this is not atomic with regard to concurrent mutations, since the lookup and removal do not share the table lock.