Skip to content

Conversation

@dosomder
Copy link
Contributor

Remove unused code according to scrutinizer-ci

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These should probably not be removed, rather just moved. Look at the comment at https://github.com/SpriteLink/NIPAP/blob/master/pynipap/pynipap.py#L317

This is rendered in the docs (by Sphinx): http://nipap.readthedocs.org/en/v0.25.0/pynipap/#pynipap.VRF.rt

Right now, there is no docs generated for command.py, but if we ever do, it would be nice if we got some comments to these variables.

garberg added a commit to garberg/NIPAP that referenced this pull request May 5, 2015
Made some modifications to SpriteLink#574. A comment was misplaced, kept pylons
imports intact and made sure a renderer is imported into the pylons
base module.
@plajjan
Copy link
Member

plajjan commented May 5, 2015

Fixed through the merge of #756. Thanks to @dosomder!

@plajjan plajjan closed this May 5, 2015
@plajjan plajjan added this to the Version 0.28 - Hades milestone May 5, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants