Stellar Index v0.46.1

[v0.46.1] — 2026-08-28

Fixed

• Transitive pricing was shipped INERT in v0.46.0. Verified on r1
  after that deploy: all four binaries on v0.46.0, and CAUP7NFA… still
  served no price_usd. applyAssetRowToDetail early-returns on
  sql.ErrNoRows, and a Soroban-native contract asset has no
  classic_assets row by definition — that table requires a G-issuer.
  The whole premise of transitive pricing is "the catalogue cannot reach
  this asset", so the one branch the feature had to survive was the one
  the fill sat behind. Both arms now route through a shared
  fillTransitivePrice, with a regression test proven red against the
  shipped bug.

  Worth recording why this was more dangerous than an ordinary bug: the
  same release taught the coverage tripwire to see the one-hop path, and
  that CTE is quote-based — so stellarindex_assets_popular_priceless
  went to 0 on deploy while the asset remained unpriced. The alert
  clearing and the gap closing are independent outcomes; only the first
  had happened. Checking the alert board would have reported success on
  what was, in effect, a bypass.