Use a star treatment for LITEFile-recommended filing choices

[nonprofittechy]

Context

This is an unfinished item from #102. The filing flow currently needs a lightweight way to identify a LITEFile recommendation/best guess without making it look like a required or authoritative court value.

Goal

Use a star treatment/icon instead of the visible Recommended label for recommended court/case-related choices, while keeping the meaning accessible and allowing the filer to choose something else.

Acceptance criteria

• Recommended choices can be visually identified with a star treatment rather than the word Recommended repeated in the choice label.
• The icon is not the only accessible indication: provide screen-reader text, an accessible name, legend, or equivalent explanation of what the star means.
• A recommendation does not silently preselect or lock a value unless the product flow separately calls for that behavior.
• The filer can override the recommendation.
• Saved user selections are not replaced by a later recommendation.
• The treatment is reusable for court/case-type or similar LITEFile-generated recommendations rather than being hard-coded to one Illinois screen.

Related

• Next LITEFile Epic #102 — Next LITEFile Epic
• filter for location / court list? #115 — court/location finder
• Audit hidden/defaulted filing values and let filers review and override them #156 — audit hidden/defaulted values and preserve user overrides
• MVP: support court selection before document upload #158 — Illinois MVP court-selection flow

[nonprofittechy]

When doing automated issue audits, we haven't closed this, but I don't think this is super actionable anymore. We already have a very clear review stage for any extracted/automatically mapped information, with much more clear labeling of the information than just a *, and no indication that it was a choice that the court made.