fix(elements): scope docs dt style to main content - #682
Merged
Conversation
The `& dt` rule had no enclosing selector, so `&` resolved to `:scope` (i.e. the whole document) instead of scoping to main content like the sibling element styles do. Relates-to TACC#680 (discussion)
PR Summary by QodoScope docs dt styling to main content selector
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (3)
|
Code Review by Qodo🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)
Great, no issues found!Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require reviewTo customize comments, go to the Qodo configuration screen, or learn more in the docs. |
wesleyboar
added a commit
to wesleyboar/Core-Styles
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2026
…instead Superseded by merging TACC#682 in next commit, so the fix is properly sourced from main rather than living only on this branch.
Simpler than scoping to main content: the `&` was unnecessary since the rule already applied everywhere via `:scope` (same net effect as no `&` at all), so just drop it instead of adding new scoping.
wesleyboar
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2026
main's tip (#682) was already applied to epic/v3 via #680's chain propagation, but #680 was squash-merged, severing epic/v3's ancestry link to main. Recording this merge with the 'ours' strategy (verified zero net content change) to restore that link so future `git merge main` operations compute the correct merge-base instead of redoing already-resolved conflicts.
wesleyboar
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2026
epic/v3's content (incl. main, via #680/#682) was already applied to epic/v3--reorg via #681's chain propagation, but #681 was squash-merged, severing the ancestry link again (same issue as #680 on epic/v3). Recording this merge with the 'ours' strategy (verified zero net content change) so future `git merge epic/v3` (and transitively `git merge main`) operations compute the correct merge-base.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Properly fixes syntax bug that browser and compile were fixing.
Remove unscoped
&fromhtml-elements.docs.css.Details
html-elements.docs.cssstylesdtwith a top-level& dt { ... }rule that has no enclosing selector, so&resolves to:scope(the whole document) instead of scoping to main content like the sibling element styles do. Flagged by Qodo on #680.Related
Changes
&fromdtruleTesting
npm run builddist/core-styles.docs.csshasdt{font-weight:var(--medium)}instead ofdt{...}.