[BUGFIX] Call proper API to obtain ViewHelper API (#1199) #1202
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Currently, the ViewHelper validation API calls the internal ViewHelper API to obtain its argument definitions for validation. However, the proper way is to use the `ViewHelperResolver`, since it is possible to redefine certain argument definitions there. This is demonstrated and tested by the `CustomViewHelperResolver` in the examples. However, this example only worked until now because of the lenient validation implementation of ViewHelpers.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, the ViewHelper validation API calls the internal ViewHelper API to obtain its argument definitions for validation. However, the proper way is to use the
ViewHelperResolver, since it is possible to redefine certain argument definitions there.This is demonstrated and tested by the
CustomViewHelperResolverin the examples. However, this example only worked until now because of the lenient validation implementation of ViewHelpers.