@datlechin — you should try Codiff. Its use of AI-generated narrative walkthroughs for reviewing changes is smart, and I think some of its newer interaction patterns could be good inspiration for TablePro.
In particular, TablePro could make AI-generated, optimized, or fixed SQL easier to trust by showing:
- a short ordered walkthrough of what changed and why
- explanations anchored to the relevant SQL lines or clauses
- a before/after diff alongside the walkthrough
- inline comments or follow-up prompts attached to a specific change
That would fit nicely with the existing Explain / Optimize / Fix Error actions: the AI result becomes something users can inspect and review, rather than just replacement text.
Codiff is local-first too, so the product philosophy feels aligned. Even if this does not become a TablePro feature directly, I think it is worth trying as a development/review tool.
@datlechin — you should try Codiff. Its use of AI-generated narrative walkthroughs for reviewing changes is smart, and I think some of its newer interaction patterns could be good inspiration for TablePro.
In particular, TablePro could make AI-generated, optimized, or fixed SQL easier to trust by showing:
That would fit nicely with the existing Explain / Optimize / Fix Error actions: the AI result becomes something users can inspect and review, rather than just replacement text.
Codiff is local-first too, so the product philosophy feels aligned. Even if this does not become a TablePro feature directly, I think it is worth trying as a development/review tool.