Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated Vitest devDependency to ^4.1.4 across several package.json files and reordered import statements in packages/start-client-core/src/client/hydrateStart.ts; no runtime logic, exported APIs, scripts, or other dependencies were changed. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 51bc7c5
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
🚀 Changeset Version PreviewNo changeset entries found. Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: eb2a2faf81
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| vitest: | ||
| specifier: ^4.0.17 | ||
| version: 4.0.18(@types/node@25.0.9)(@vitest/ui@4.0.18)(esbuild@0.27.4)(jiti@2.6.1)(jsdom@25.0.1)(msw@2.7.0(@types/node@25.0.9)(typescript@6.0.2))(sass-embedded@1.97.2)(sass@1.97.2)(terser@5.37.0)(tsx@4.20.3)(yaml@2.8.1) | ||
| specifier: ^4.1.4 | ||
| version: 4.1.4(@types/node@25.0.9)(@vitest/ui@4.0.18)(jsdom@25.0.1)(msw@2.7.0(@types/node@25.0.9)(typescript@6.0.2))(vite@8.0.0(@types/node@25.0.9)(esbuild@0.27.4)(jiti@2.6.1)(sass-embedded@1.97.2)(sass@1.97.2)(terser@5.37.0)(tsx@4.20.3)(yaml@2.8.1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This bump moves vitest to 4.1.4 while the lockfile still resolves @vitest/browser/@vitest/ui to 4.0.18, and those package entries declare an exact peer on vitest: 4.0.18 (same pnpm-lock.yaml package metadata). That creates an unsatisfied peer combination in the root importer, which can surface as peer install warnings and brittle failures when running browser/UI Vitest flows that rely on internal version alignment.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 87-88: Update package.json to align Vitest ecosystem versions:
change the dependency entries for "@vitest/browser" and "@vitest/ui" to use the
same version specifier as "vitest" (set both to "^4.1.4"), then run your package
manager to refresh the lockfile (npm install / yarn install) so peer dependency
resolution is updated.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: fc6bf568-95ae-40ac-b59c-9333fd1cb9a1
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
benchmarks/client-nav/package.jsonbenchmarks/ssr/package.jsone2e/eslint-plugin-start/package.jsonexamples/react/start-bun/package.jsonexamples/solid/start-bun/package.jsonpackage.json
Bundle Size Benchmarks
Trend sparkline is historical gzip bytes ending with this PR measurement; lower is better. |
![nx-cloud[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/80458?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
At least one additional CI pipeline execution has run since the conclusion below was written and it may no longer be applicable.
Nx Cloud is proposing a fix for your failed CI:
We fix the ESLint import/order violations in hydrateStart.ts by reordering imports so that internal (#tanstack-*) imports precede relative (./, ../) imports. This aligns with the configured ESLint rule requiring external → internal → parent → sibling ordering, resolving the 3 errors blocking @tanstack/start-client-core:test:eslint.
Tip
✅ We verified this fix by re-running @tanstack/start-client-core:test:eslint.
diff --git a/packages/start-client-core/src/client/hydrateStart.ts b/packages/start-client-core/src/client/hydrateStart.ts
index 20ca5b1b0d..206b70505c 100644
--- a/packages/start-client-core/src/client/hydrateStart.ts
+++ b/packages/start-client-core/src/client/hydrateStart.ts
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
import { hydrate } from '@tanstack/router-core/ssr/client'
-import { ServerFunctionSerializationAdapter } from './ServerFunctionSerializationAdapter'
-import type { AnyRouter, AnySerializationAdapter } from '@tanstack/router-core'
-import type { AnyStartInstanceOptions } from '../createStart'
import { startInstance } from '#tanstack-start-entry'
import {
hasPluginAdapters,
pluginSerializationAdapters,
} from '#tanstack-start-plugin-adapters'
import { getRouter } from '#tanstack-router-entry'
+import { ServerFunctionSerializationAdapter } from './ServerFunctionSerializationAdapter'
+import type { AnyRouter, AnySerializationAdapter } from '@tanstack/router-core'
+import type { AnyStartInstanceOptions } from '../createStart'
export async function hydrateStart(): Promise<AnyRouter> {
const router = await getRouter()
Or Apply changes locally with:
npx nx-cloud apply-locally 7Lnc-FCnc
Apply fix locally with your editor ↗ View interactive diff ↗
🎓 Learn more about Self-Healing CI on nx.dev
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit