Skip to content

ci: build Linux releases on Bookworm#42

Merged
TerminallyLazy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/linux-release-compatibility
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

ci: build Linux releases on Bookworm#42
TerminallyLazy merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/linux-release-compatibility

Conversation

@TerminallyLazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Problem

The public v0.13.0 Linux x86_64 archive was built on ubuntu-latest and requires GLIBC 2.39. Executing that artifact on Debian Bookworm fails before startup because Bookworm provides GLIBC 2.36.

Fix

  • build Linux release archives in an immutable amd64 Rust 1.89 / Debian Bookworm image
  • execute the packaged binary in an immutable Debian Bookworm runtime before upload
  • allow manual release rebuilds to checkout an explicit source ref such as v0.13.0
  • pin release-workflow actions and container images by commit or digest
  • document the glibc 2.36 binary baseline

Validation

  • reproduced the public artifact failure on Bookworm
  • built v0.13.0 locally in the pinned amd64 Bookworm image
  • verified archive checksum
  • executed version, help, init, agent-scoped remember, exact retry, and filtered recall in the pinned Bookworm runtime
  • actionlint 1.7.7 passed
  • YAML and diff checks passed

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@TerminallyLazy, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 33 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ab6b8a02-f60a-4f6f-a2e1-131f5d9d3d5e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b309ee and 6700fe6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
  • README.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/linux-release-compatibility

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@TerminallyLazy
TerminallyLazy merged commit 99cc965 into main Jul 23, 2026
2 checks passed
@TerminallyLazy
TerminallyLazy deleted the codex/linux-release-compatibility branch July 23, 2026 22:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant