Skip to content

docs(README): 微调项目简介文案; - #343

Merged
ThreeFish-AI merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feature/1.x.x
Apr 12, 2026
Merged

docs(README): 微调项目简介文案;#343
ThreeFish-AI merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feature/1.x.x

Conversation

@ThreeFish-AI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

docs(README): 微调项目简介文案;

🤖 Generated with Claude Code, CodeX, Gemini
Co-Authored-By: Aurelius Huangthreefish.ai@gmail.com

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://github.com/claude), [CodeX](https://openai.com), [Gemini](https://github.com/apps/gemini-code-assist)
Co-Authored-By: Aurelius Huang<threefish.ai@gmail.com>
@ThreeFish-AI
ThreeFish-AI merged commit 1563dc7 into master Apr 12, 2026
ThreeFish-AI added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2026
沉淀存量 alert 清零过程中的四项实测结论,其中两项推翻既有记载:

- setuptools #555 由 dismiss 改判为升级:记录 pip-audit 双配置对照(保留/剔除
  ignore 匹配数同为 8)作为「该 ignore 已死」的判据,以及「有零成本修复路径时
  消因优于记账」这一对上一轮最小干预判断的修正
- torch #507:旧记「四方联动约束」证伪(constraint 解析下三个 PDF 引擎零位移),
  真实阻断是 torchvision 0.29 与 transformers 4.57.6 在 docling worker 的不兼容
- transformers #678/#499:pillow<11 冲突经 uv lock exit 1 与上游 METADATA 双重证实
- 附带订正:marker-pdf 1.10.2(当前锁定版)本身也声明 Pillow<11,现状已由 override
  压过;准确表述应为「已验证组合换未验证组合」,而非「升 marker 会把 pillow 降级」

两条方法论增补(本轮踩坑所得):
- override-dependencies 会静默压过上游声明,故不能用它验证「某约束是否可行」,
  必须用 constraint-dependencies(冲突即报错)——本轮曾因此得到 transformers 5.x
  「能解析」的假象
- 验证必须走本项目真实调用路径:DocumentConverter 直调在 torch 2.14 下成功,
  只有经 perceives engine worker 才失败,只测上游库会得出完全相反的结论

另记 GitHub 侧收口:dismiss #678/#499/#507,并刷新 #492/#343 两条历史 dismiss 的
陈旧 comment(原载已证伪的 transformers.onnx 口径)。

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://github.com/claude), [CodeX](https://openai.com), [Gemini](https://github.com/apps/gemini-code-assist)
Co-Authored-By: Aurelius Huang<threefish.ai@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant