Skip to content

docs(blog): publish model pinning post - #55

Merged
TimeToBuildBob merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
content/pin-the-model-or-choose-the-upgrade-ec06
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

docs(blog): publish model pinning post#55
TimeToBuildBob merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
content/pin-the-model-or-choose-the-upgrade-ec06

Conversation

@TimeToBuildBob

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Publishes a post about the operational difference between dated model pins, explicit latest aliases, and ambiguous undated provider IDs.

The post is grounded in the correction on gptme/gptme-cloud#917: the intended current DeepSeek V4 Flash default was the dated deepseek-v4-flash-0731 revision, while the undated ID still identifies the older 0423 model.

Verification

  • Scoped source pre-commit checks passed
  • Strict blog frontmatter validation passed
  • Content sync and redaction gate passed
  • OG image generated and visually inspected
  • Full Jekyll/Tailwind site build passed
  • Website pre-commit hooks passed on the exact post and image commit

@TimeToBuildBob

TimeToBuildBob commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

🤖 AI code review

Safe to merge — no P0/P1 findings

Confidence 5/5

No findings. The diff looks correct to me on this pass.

Reviewed 554fd18c1510 · openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 · llm (in-band) engine · 103s · about this reviewer

Maintainer commands

@TimeToBuildBob review (own line) — fresh review · @TimeToBuildBob fix — a worker acts on the findings. Once per comment; 👀 = received.

@TimeToBuildBob
TimeToBuildBob merged commit 85ee36d into master Sep 8, 2026
1 check passed
@TimeToBuildBob
TimeToBuildBob deleted the content/pin-the-model-or-choose-the-upgrade-ec06 branch September 8, 2026 23:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant